That would only account for ~10% of global emissions.
It's not really worth considering solutions that are going to maybe move the needle by 0.001%. Honestly, hope seems like a better strategy and less a waste of time than that.
If you really want to discuss it - you should preface very discussion with - "This isn't going to make the slightest difference at all in the grand scheme of things, but hear me out anyway..."
Carbon capture is propaganda from the fossil fuel industry to pretend like there is any viable alternative from phasing out fossil fuels almost entirely.
The fossil fuel industry has already won as much as they could - much to the younger generations detriment.
Economics alone should phase out ~60% of fossil fuel usage by 2050. There is nothing they can do to change that at this point.
Unfortunately, depending on the curve - the planet could get way hotter by then.
But, I'm also optimistic that a hotter planet is not going to spell disaster like most people think.