Hacker News routinely allows shill pieces written by guys sponsored by people advocating the climate catastrophe narrative. I haven't seen those getting flagged.
Do you have an example?
I'm surprised that no one here disagreeing with him seems able to muster a non-ad-hominem argument against what he's saying.
Spoiler but it's for the same reason people arent all rushing to refute flat earthers.
Right, simple arrogance.
I refuted flat earthers, and I learned why they think what they do, and why I think it's round.
Arrogance is not an argument.
How can you disagree with him when he doesn't even define what "rapid elimination" entails? It's not even a strawman. He has completely failed to define what he is arguing against.