Solution 26370: Removing a new Texas Instruments calculator from the package
education.ti.com
education.ti.com
Hence the old saying, "a sharp knife is safer than a dull one."
(pointing it out mostly because I'm annoyed by the "never try to catch a falling knife" metaphor for the stock market, because a rising knife would be just as dangerous to catch which makes sense but completely nullifies the metaphor.)
On the danger of packaging, there's that terrific cartoon of a guy stranded alone on a desert island trying to open his blister packed survival kit, but then bleeding to death
> "never try to catch a falling knife" metaphor for the stock market
I've only ever heard this as literal advice: if you drop a knife, do not try to catch it. Move your feet/make sure the knife doesn't hit you, but do not attempt to grab it.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%22never+try+to+catch+a+fal...
the plurality of results are references to investment markets.
I don't want to be snarky but the article says to use scissors and I wouldn't think this was a problem for most people?
I have an indoor pair of tin snips for just this occasion. Cuts smoothly through the plastic, and keeps my hand further away from the sharp bits.
I go buy a reasonable quality multi-bit screwdriver. It's packaging comes with a large, hard plastic shell around the handle.
What's the shell secured with? A screw.
So you need to buy two of them so you can unscrew one, and return the other.
But if you are going to cut open one of those Costco clamshell things, just take the same approach you would cutting thin sheet steel. Stout gloves and a nibbler.
https://www.bebolddigital.com/blog/what-is-amazon-frustratio....
I wonder who that article is for tbh, like what target audience would read that and walk away satisfied/with their questions answered?
Later parts of the article seem generated by an LLM or someone without good English and make little sense, e.g. the "Tell me the packaging requirement?" section, which says it lists the requirements but doesn't, or the "Does my product meet Amazon's requirements for frustration-free packaging?" section which starts "This question is interesting" and contains "Tell us what Amazon is looking for when testing products that are frustration-free. The bag must be packed in about 2 minutes. 2. Packaging of the actual product is not larger than 2 cm." What?
> "there are a few key things to keep in mind when doing packaging design"
So these are guidelines are about package design, not the product that goes inside.
"Your product must be prep free packaging"... apparently "Prep Free Packaging" is a thing in package design: https://apasslab.com/prep-free-packaging-pfp-over-boxing/
The later parts of the article are targeted at people who do this stuff for a living: apparently Amazon gives 120 seconds (2 minutes) for undoing the contents of the package if something qualifies for frustration free for example.
_
I mean sure maybe the english isn't impeccable, but even half of the 10+ item list at the top is enough to give even a layperson an idea of what frustration free means.
Any particular flavor work better (eg - cinnamon, mint)?
I have some questions about the provenance of this claim.
You can also cut pennies in half if you're ever bored with traditional packaging.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0006ACWEQ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b...
Paradox resolved!
:) -- or, better, :(