Hacker News Reader

You appear to be leaping to the wrong conclusion. The problem is Canonical charging money for security updates. CentOS, Alma, Rocky, Fedora, Debian, openSUSE, Arch, and 300+ other Linux distros don't charge money for security updates either. The moral of the story is "Don't use enshitifying corporate Linux distros run by crazy people."

View on HN

This still has nothing to do with the ImageMagick developers, which the original comment implies: "Compare [sic] to codesign, vulnerability management is more concerning."

You are free to criticize Canonical for their business model, but that seems off-topic to me right now.

The problem of Canonical charging money for security updates is off-topic when we're discussing ImageMagick's code-signing troubles on Windows.

That's your opinion, and I don't care for your attempts to shut people down. Kindly control people on the rest of the internet. :peace:

Reply on news.ycombinator.com