My students are know nothings
twitter.com
twitter.com
They view the world with glasses looking backward applying them to the present and future. (A form of if all you have is a hammer)
If yesteryear the rote learning curriculum was about knowing Who was X and what did Y do then they’ll expect that everybody coming in today should know that verbatim and convince you it’s in your future’s best interest to commit your memory to it too.
Rarely does life work that way. More so in real (western) life, it’s all a game and you score high if you can find how to cheat the game or carve a niche for yourself.
A society that punishes heavily for failure can’t expect that people would emerge well rounded. It can absolutely expect that people would be professional gamers.
So while in an ideal situation, students would be learning the context of a historical event, dive deeper in a topic, to create a better, more informed knowledge, what's the point? Does knowing more about Plato help with Java 101 by a statistically significant margin?
Seems like a very limited view of what knowledge is important.
The last I heard ( meaning it's hearsay) they were not well grounded in the practical aspects ( as opposed to theoretical) of these subjects either.