Hacker News Reader

Comment by trulyunruly | Hacker News Reader

Cunningham's Law:) I was only hoping to provide some direction. But thank you for finding the right answer.

I found and posted the answer in parallel with you, and then deleted my direct response when I replied to yours (at greater length as I initially posted only the link, which was sufficient for merely answering the question).

I don't think the posting of unverified ChatGPT snippets in response to factual questions on HN has value.

You have great search engine skills! Out of curiosity, what was the exact input you used, and on which search engine? I tried "adventure book girl named gedanken and grandfather on einstein theory" on Google and didn't get the right answer.

I had to refine it twice, IIRC, ending up with something like 'einstein book story girl "gedanken"' (the second refinement being by clicking next to one of the links that didn't include "gedanken"), for which one of the results was a New Scientist review of the book.

I did it on Google because I was on iPhone Safari, which doesn't have a good way to use Kagi by default, but I strongly prefer Kagi where possible.

I know we’re really getting into the weeds here, but I’m curious what issues you’re having with iOS Safari and Kagi. I’m using it with both normal and private tabs and it’s working great. There were a series of fixes in the past month to the Kagi app (necessary for Safari integration) that specifically addressed issues with private browsing. Might want to try it again. Good luck!

I just dislike the idea of installing an app or extension just to change the default search engine. Not Kagi's fault, entirely Apple's.

Definitely agree. Ideally you’d be able to extend the search engine list in Safari’s settings but alas.

I agree. I usually don’t respond with generated text. But in this instance I wanted to try to see if GPT-4 could sniff out the book that was being searched for. As of the dangers in GPT responses, it is easy to be mislead. I vetted the response (existence of author, books), but not in depth of what was actually asked for. And for that reason I failed to catch the error that you pointed out. But thank you for doing so, will definitely be more critical to GPT responses in the future. And also not post generated content that is clearly wrong.

So in effect, several possible responses were sent from the past, but the irrelevant ones were deleted, leaving only the right answer. Hmmm.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com