is not how the uk courts work(ed) thats what legal aid is for. granted in practice now its not the case, but for any crown court there is still legal aid for most cases.
is not how the uk courts work(ed) thats what legal aid is for. granted in practice now its not the case, but for any crown court there is still legal aid for most cases.
An alternative: let's send the defendant to public housing before they head to court. They'll still have a roof over their head!
If you read the letter and believe that the government is requesting, or that X and Rumble are agreeing to, the de-monetisation of Brand's content, then we should address a reading comprehension challenge. If you can see that this -- "preemptively cutting someone's livelihood" -- is definitely not happening, then I would encourage you to more precisely convey what you mean, because this attempt almost perfectly expresses the opposite of reality.