It's Retrieval Augmented Generation btw.
To quote:
> The key idea is this: a user asks a question. You search your private documents for content that appears relevant to the question, then paste excerpts of that content into the LLM (respecting its size limit, usually between 3,000 and 6,000 words) along with the original question.
> The LLM can then answer the question based on the additional content you provided.
Why? Have links gone out of fashion?
I even linked directly to the relevant section rather than linking to the top of the page.
The paper that coined the term used the hyphen, though I think I prefer it without: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401
Yes.
You wrote far more words than needed to answer the comment, I did it for you instead.
Should we all do the ad hominem thing? You are actually suggesting that?