Half of them add the same single line that isn't even attached to the rest of the letter!
That's a world apart from φ and Д.
Else, the Italians, French and the like don't appear to be using Roman, either.
https://dustri.org/b/horrible-edge-cases-to-consider-when-de...
Also from Wikipedia:
Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky (note: Often anglicized as Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky; also standardized by the Library of Congress. His names are also transliterated as Piotr or Petr; Ilitsch or Il'ich; and Tschaikowski, Tschaikowsky, Chajkovskij, or Chaikovsky. He used to sign his name/was known as P. Tschaïkowsky/Pierre Tschaïkowsky in French (as in his afore-reproduced signature), and Peter Tschaikowsky in German, spellings also displayed on several of his scores' title pages in their first printed editions alongside or in place of his native name. The modern transliterations of Russian produce the following results for 'Пётр Ильич Чайковский' — ISO 9: Pëtr Ilʹič Čajkovskij, ALA-LC: Pëtr Ilʹich Chaĭkovskiĭ, BGN/PCGN: Pëtr Il'ich Chaykovskiy.)
I’m told today the transliterations are standardised enough that it doesn’t happen much. Greek and Russian friends describe less mangling of their names than I get.
Luckily I live in Armenia now, which not only has its own alphabet, but also has a tradition of armenising Slavic patronyms! (Which is fair, I guess, as Armenian patronyms are commonly russified in Slavic countries.)
Anyway, the transliteration of Cyrillic at least is not really standardised in my experience. It used to be worse, with Polish, French and English styles, now it settled on English, but there are a still several sticking points which cause combinatoric explosion of variants. Not to mention that my perspective is centered on Russian, and there is a different standard of transliteration for Ukrainian at least (Kyiv and Kiev are Levenshtein 2 apart in Latin, but Levenshtein 1 apart in Cyrillic), and there is a ton of other Cyrillic languages.
He's also Volodymyr / Vladimir, and it's like with Kyiv: the Levenshtein difference is increased by transliteration.
Also, I discovered that Levenshtein himself was from USSR, and that's why he's not Levenstein. Though I would not be surprised if some of his relatives would prefer Levenstein, just like Ekaterina (or Yekaterina?) Schulmann [1] doesn't like to be spelled as Shulman.
I am not sure about that part, iirc Bulgarian folks can pick how their name gets to be transliterated during the application for passport.
>English speakers tend to avoid even trying to use the other alphabet
Why care about English only, most of the Europe is not natively English speaking (save for the UK, Ireland and Malta) - the odds are the name are to be transliterated once to 'English', then pronounced in Spanish (think of the glorious H and J) or German (W vs V)
Also, remember that it's Gorbachev in English, Gorbatchev in French, Gorbatschow in German, and so on, so there isn't likely to be a single Latin transcription unless it's one that's incompatible with existing usage.
Also note that it's usually "Rachmaninoff" in English, because he moved to the USA and became a US citizen at age 69, though you'd normally expect that name to be written as "Rakhmaninov" in English, I think; it's written "Rachmaninow" in German, for example. But that's an example of a different problem, really: people changing their names. While they're alive perhaps you might want to use their current official name, but when they're dead and if they're famous then you probably don't want to be forced to use the name that they adopted as a joke just before they died.
Names are not unique anyway. For most official purposes you should identify people with some kind of number and use the name as a check or to help a human sort things out when something doesn't match and you suspect that the number is wrong.