It cannot pass under any circumstance, it needs to be rejected as a whole. There is no compromise to be had.
Also some civil rights activist that believe this proposal to be quite illegal.
There were also public hearings with technical experts about feasibility that were said to be a huge embarrassment for people proposing the bill as the rejection was so clear. I think from nine experts, zero accepted the proposal and made pretty clear, that this is to be rejected with prejudice.
The only ones in tech that I know of at least are those that want to sell their own AI solutions. As I said, there was quite a bit of lobbying.
On "piracy", if you can tune to foreign TV streams is not piracy.
That doesn’t mean it’s ethically wrong, but that’s another question entirely.