932 miles is suspiciously specific.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/546/187/fb1...
932 “must” come from a lazy performance calculation because they came in assuming it is wrong and that is the first error they think of
This produced an “exact” number out of consumption averages. The public doesn’t yet know what “250 kWh” means.
It's just an open invitation for abuse (and has already been abused by battery makers like CATL who recently announced a new improved LFP with 4C charging and 750 miles range??).