uhh so? X% of those are American of East Asian descent, and, regardless, East Asian != Chinese
Granted, you see plenty of wealthy Chinese at the graduate level at Ivies because they have $$ and want the social currency, but that's not the substance of true educational domination.
I don't necessarily disagree with your overall thesis; I'm not qualified to say one way or the other. Just pointing out this alleged datum doesn't support it.
> You look in ANY American colleges, you will find "East Asians" a lot even more so in Ivy Leagues.
Why are they in US instead of China?
That was considered a remote possibility a mere decade ago, but nowadays some scientists consider it more likely than not.
because the US still has the reputation of better higher education. but also, many of the chinese students will go back to china and bring their experience with them. this will benefit china, but also the experience of living in a foreign country will promote a better understanding between china and the US and create a better future for the world
The college numbers have been changing too https://www.axios.com/2023/05/08/chinese-students-us-educati...
In the time it takes for China's population to fall this low, the US population is expected to grow significantly, assuming the current rate of immigration continues.
>Look at Japan, their 100m dwindling to 80m still so dominant
Innovation and GDP growth has basically completely stopped in Japan due to the burden of the aging population. What's the last piece of innovative software or hardware you used that was made in Japan?
Nintendo is the only company left that knows how to actually make good games, so Japan at least has that going for them.
And by this measure, China's advantage vs the US will shrink even more.