YouTube now blocking ad block
old.reddit.com
old.reddit.com
- "If YouTube adds so much value to your life, then you should pay for YouTube Premium -- Why are you being frugal about it?"
- "I want to be in control of what I see on webpages -- No company should enforce their agenda on me. If I don't like to see YouTube Shorts or Recommendations, then I must have that freedom. uBlock is more than an adblocker at this point -- it allows me to "detox" the bloated YouTube UI and make it more tolerable."
The second group might not even mind paying for YouTube Premium, but that doesn't solve their problem. If YouTube really wants to increase revenue, there are other ways.
"I was fine with paying for YouTube, but the price has gotten so high that it's unreasonable."
I'm not going to pay YouTube more than I do Netflix, Hulu, Disney, even Spotify. Especially when they're starting to get competition from Nebula, Curiosity Stream, and even TikTok.
Patreon is much more helpful and we don't know how much of a membership goes to creators. Nebula seems great but doesn't allow for free access to education for all of it is a paid service so that seems like a worse way to gatekeep information than ads alone.
What the second group of people really want is to not pay for it and also block ads.
About 10 years ago i put up some basic videos of some openGL stuff and games stuff I was working on for college. These were screen recordings. Not from a camera phone.
A few months ago I checked and YouTube had converted them all to shorts. No way to undo this. Now my decade old very basic projects get randomly shown to people that didn't search for it. And the Shorts format removes/hides all the text explaining the video context etc.
Youtube have no method to allow me to undo this. Any video of certain resolutions and lengths will be converted to a short. The only suggestion online from other users is to reupload the videos but add large side margins.
I find Shorts annoying, but at least on the web YouTube and on the app version that is on my streaming devices Shorts are grouped together making them easy to ignore. It's not like they autoplay or are animated. They just take up a little space on some pages.
Recommendations are also easy to ignore.
It is a disservice to users of the service to whittle down this issue to 2 simple points. Under Google's lead, YouTube has been offering a service - as we've been accustomed to accessing it - since 2006. That's ~17 years.
Suddenly, they want to change the very nature of their business model. It is no longer the YouTube we've been accustomed to accessing for those ~17 years. A no log-in required service, ad-blockers, plenty of browser extensions, etc..
Let's keep in mind that YouTube made ~$29.2 billion in revenue in 2022 [0, 1]. They reported 2.7 billion active users in 2023 - this makes them second only to Facebook.
Its YouTube Premium Service has 80 million subscribers (as of September 11, 2022). Netflix, in comparison, has 247 million subscribers worldwide (3rd qrt, 2023) [2]. Disney+ has 146 million worldwide subscribers (3rd qtr, 2023) but they've been bleeding subscribers [3]. These are actual Premium Video Services.
YouTube is trying to be both an annoying (ad-ridden) general video site and a very expensive premium site. I call this arrogance.
Basically... YouTube is doing very well financially right now ($29 billion). They want to make even more money because $282.8 billion (2022) in revenue for Alphabet is not enough [4]. We can all see the greed.
The problem... Google wants to do this by changing the core of their business as far as access is concerned. It is this change to their core business model that we are up in arms about. It will no longer be the same site.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube?useskin=vector
[1] https://www.businessofapps.com/data/youtube-statistics/
[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/250934/quarterly-number-...
[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095372/disney-plus-numb...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet_Inc.?useskin=vector
I don't think it takes $29 billion to run it but if it hypothetically took say $24 billion that is a 20% revenue loss from take a loss in the billions.
I tried looking for this but failed to find anything. I also thought about how these multi-billion dollar companies hide profits behind tax codes so that - many times - they pay little or no taxes. This, more than anything else, makes the search for real profits very difficult.
Netflix made ~$31.6 billion in revenue worldwide and they are profitable - as well as undisputed leaders in the Premium Video Category.
Google is so quick to kill projects that, I think, if YT wasn't (happily) successful it would have made changes long ago.
YouTube has 2.7 billion users.
If YouTube paid per user what Netflix did they would go broke.
So it isn't as simple as "Netflix does okay".
Especially since you say these changes make you want to leave the platform. Why would you expect YouTube to cause that kind of damage earlier than necessary?
I don't claim they need this to survive, just that it is hard to know how profitable they are without any real numbers.
The Netflix to YouTube comparison is an apples to oranges one.
I would compare TikTok and/or Facebbok to YouTube before I make comparisons to Netflix because their business models align... attracting as many eyeballs as possible. That's it. Numbers for its sake.
Through our efforts - they did just that. They were successful in attracting over 2.5 billion active monthly users. That was their main goal.
It was up to them to monetize it in a way that didn't chase users away. They did that for nearly 17 years. There were no complaints at any time.
It was sort of like Microsoft's monopoly on Operating Systems. They rather we pirate their OS than take the chance we would get comfortable using another OS. Well, Google was the same. They rather some of us use ad-blockers than possibly use another service - ie, keeping those eyeballs only on their site.
I do not see Google doing anything to keep me (and many millions of others) from leaving. Quite the opposite. Nowadays, I have basically moved over to TikTok - their actual competitor. Their hardball tactics mean little to me. They may also be losing an entire younger generation (too tired to source this).
Maybe they just resigned to losing the numbers game and are trying to segue into increasing revenue. I don't know. Netflix/Disney/Amazon are there the same way Facebook was there when they tried Google+. TikTok is also there for the short-form, creator stuff. YouTube is surrounded...
Google seems to not understand the market anymore but they're trying to keep investors happy with revenue growth.
It really makes no difference to me what Google does. I shrug. Their only hope to fend off TikTok is government intervention. Attempts, as is common knowledge, have already been made.
I don't care how you feel about Google, I am just pointing out that "they made a lot of money" has an asterisk.
---------------------
Google's quarterly earnings are out (Q3, 2023): $20B of net profit:
Net profit + 42% // taxes - 35% : Y/Y
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/17fpdl8/oc...
---------------------
Extra: How profitable are the big tech firms really? Apple, Amazon, Google & Microsoft
June-2022, Quarterly
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/wctzq9/oc_...
--------------------- Really nice job on the charts, trends, etc.. Very clear:
Apple Q4 2023 financial results and charts:
https://sixcolors.com/post/2023/11/apple-q4-2023-financial-r...
Archives:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231103000323/https://sixcolors...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35892512
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37793375
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35883457
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37782171
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37106802
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37798150
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36277079
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37825887
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37866601
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35916592
I do wonder if the actual outcome of the experiment was increased rates of adblocking though - since every time it makes it into the news, more people are exposed to the idea it's even possible.
Aside, (cmd+l, cmd+c, cmd+shit+n, cmd+v, enter) is a pretty useful sequence to have muscle memory for to open the same page in incognito, which easily bypasses the block as well.
Or if your ad blocker updated its filters to a version which successfully evaded the ad-blocker detection.
[1] The current youtube ad notice version can be found at the bottom of this link. No dates, but it's useful to compare if you knew what the last uBlock Origin filter version you were aware of. https://pastefy.app/G1Txv5su/raw