It's an unfair comparison because Tailwind as a library is composed of tooling, documentation, design patterns, good practices and obviously CSS. The same is for other libraries, e.g., Bootstrap.

I agree that using Tailwind--without extra effort--will end up with "meaningless" (not really) classes in the HTML.

But semantics should be prioritized in HTML rather than CSS or class names. What's the benefit of having semantic classes when your HTML is inaccessible and unsemantic? e.g., using `a` instead of `button`, `img` with unsemantic alternative text.