Britsh Museum Collection Search
britishmuseum.org
britishmuseum.org
It's ironic too given that it's a museum that's famous for having stored a lot of the world's most important archaeological treasures while destroying the chronology of the most important sites in the process.
The first would aide people who stumble over stolen goods and the second would be interesting.
There is now an airport-style security channel with staff who open and scan your bags.
For 30 years I've been a casual visitor to the British Museum and have never seen this. It used to be lunch-time detour when I was at UCL to walk through the ground floor simply as a shortcut from Russell Square.
I am not sure what their threat model is; maybe vandalism as protest, but as a security anecdote it's amazing to see all of this security theatre while all along it was the staff (and probably those in high positions) who were sneaking out millions of pounds of treasure.
Through the lens of security thinking I now see it as axiomatic that the consequences for the misdeeds of the privileged and powerful always fall upon the innocent and vulnerable.
This needs incorporating into the root of any formal account of security thinking - because we always seem to be wasting our time scrutinising and inconveniencing the wrong people.
If true, where's the proof?
https://medium.com/@thepublicrealm.uk/the-british-museums-ve...
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/14/just-sto...
- https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/just-stop-oil-uk-museu...
Also, bizarrely, Nixon is listed as "Richard Nixon," Trump as "Donald Trump," Kennedy as "John F Kennedy," the Bush's as "President George Bush" and "President George W Bush," and for some reason Obama as "Barack Hussein Obama." Are they worried he'll be confused with all the other Barack Obamas? Why are only the Bush's "president?"
Searching "president," lists "President Saddam Hussein" so not only the Bush's. They also have Hussein toilet paper https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_EPH-ME-5