Maybe it’s just where I work, but I feel like even this isn’t true. A lot of the newer/young employees don’t even seem to have a lot of OS/system understanding. A lot of the higher-level languages abstract the immediate need of having any “intimate understanding” of CPUs.
I had done work in the C/C++ code modifying Chromium directly and went, “that’s not how the browser talks to the OS to use the GPU for acceleration”. They immediately tried to argue I was wrong and made some more nonsense up.
This person is a very competent coder, but we got into further discussions and it was made very clear they had lived in a JavaScript landscape for either far too long, or had only barely gone over basic computing concepts. Their understanding of computers largely ended at “and then v8 does some stuff”.
It was weird cause this person had an honours level computer science degree from a very prestigious university and they were not from some rich family that could have paid their way through schooling.
They also had over a decade of experience shipping numerous projects. It really threw me for a loop as to what a software engineer needs to know to succeed at very high levels professionally.
> It really threw me for a loop as to what a software engineer needs to know to succeed at very high levels professionally
he is arguably more successful while you have prematurely optimized
do things that make money, since that’s clearly the priority and context here
Sure--until he isn't. And that happens north of "senior".
I've had a lot of I-shaped people reporting to and taking direction from me in my career, and I'm not as deep at any one thing as many of them. But I'm deeper at a lot of things than most of those folks, and I can synthesize solutions to more complex problems because of them. Heck, things I learned writing games in my teens still come up on occasion twenty years later.
Huh? If they'd got private tutoring, that wouldn't make them understand things any less?
Legacy admissions exist.
There are of course a million other ways people fail upwards.
On the other hand I agree that people who take the non-CS route may not be that intimately familiar with all the details.
This is largely irrelevant to the concept of sequential programming.