I don't know if I got any chemical benefit from subsequent use, other than fun (with the consistently worsening serotonin crash afterwards). But just being able to step outside my usual angsty 19-year-old brain for a few hours had a profound effect.
I don't know if I got any chemical benefit from subsequent use, other than fun (with the consistently worsening serotonin crash afterwards). But just being able to step outside my usual angsty 19-year-old brain for a few hours had a profound effect.
Although I do know people who are clinically depressed, and the hangover/crash doesn't bother them as much, because it's their normal state anyway.
However, insofar as fun is synonymous with happiness, which is antonymous with depression, every cure for depression involves the end goal of fun - one way or another. Pharmaceutically / chemically, emotionally, socially, intellectually, spiritually, you-name-it.
Therefore, regarding this topic, I was positing that, where usage of recreational drugs as a novel cure for depression is concerned, the fun is the curative. But I can see how my generalisation could be interpreted as minimalising, if viewed as a pithy solution precluding all nuance - which it was not intended as!
Granted, I never did it in a quiet "therapeutic" environment, I would have thought of it as a waste because I considered the music and dancing an integral part of the experience, it's a pretty recreational and hedonistic substance after all.
It's not that surprising that if you only use it to "rave for hours" and "open the door for other chemical drugs", then you'll find it a "recreational and hedonistic substance". That's practically a tautology.