How does Disney fail to make money off Star Wars? Because they decided to build a shitty tech company in-house instead of just doing what they know and licensing their content to the experts.
They had to have it all, and they played themselves.
How does Disney fail to make money off Star Wars? Because they decided to build a shitty tech company in-house instead of just doing what they know and licensing their content to the experts.
They had to have it all, and they played themselves.
If Netflix has more valuable technical excellence it should show in the customer experience of the product.
They were working towards being as bad as prime, but prime was "free" if you subscribed to at least one twitch channel, and Netflix kept raising prices.
With some businesses the drive for features may be driven by the number of users using that feature. I wish my Apple TV could add Netflix to the up next based on which profile we were using.
But it’s not a deal breaker, would be nice.
So I wonder if the work required to get it on there would take resources from areas that more customers are using?
It sort of worked with the app..
https://www.digitaltrends.com/movies/netflix-apple-tv-app/
Then with TV+ it didn't...
https://bgr.com/business/netflix-apple-tv-new-service/
Of course, now most smart TVs fingerprint what's on screen and sell that data so the data is out there.
Meanwhile, here's who plays (literally) nicely:
https://support.apple.com/en-nz/HT208083
The 'channel' subs are most seamless, but heads up Apple doesn't let 'channels' list some of their less family oriented content while apps can.
The UIs may suck in some way or another, or be buggy, but the backend doesn’t struggle anymore than Netflix with serving 4K streaming video to me.
Maybe their costs are higher because their technical expertise is less… I’m not sure.
The tech difference from a user's perspective between HBO, Disney, Hulu, and Netflix today is nil.
Beyond that, you don't have to _rebuild Netflix_. Even if you do a good job, that's very expensive. It's folly to think you're going to make more money doing that than you will striking very favorable licensing terms with a fairly desperate tech company. Keep the "we could just build Disney+" in your back pocket as a threat.
There was a time when this was to much hazel to set up compared with a Netflix subscription.
Protip and disclaimer: never work for Disney as a contractor. They'll blame you for their own faults and bring the lawyers out on you for shiggles.
They may or may not have tech issues. Their issues with Star Wars are far larger than anything having to do with tech, starting from the fact that apparently no-one associated with Star Wars in over a decade appears to like, understand or even be more than superficially familiar with Star Wars.
In the particular case of Rian Johnson, if one only examined The Last Jedi it would not be clear that he is even superficially familiar with cinema, film, science fiction, space opera or simple storytelling. The Force Awakens may have been bad fan fiction, but TLJ was something I’ve never seen before: hate fiction. Actually, maybe ‘hate’ is too strong a word: perhaps TLJ is evidence of a creative team who doesn’t appear to hate Star Wars so much as resent it. They appear to have resented it for existing, for being successful, for being a world they had to tell their stories in. But it’s resentment tinged with something verging into hatred.
I honestly believe that for generations to come Disney’s squandering of the Star Wars franchise will be taught in schools alongside the New Coke fiasco. It’s remarkable: while success would not necessarily have been easy, Disney could have churned out low-effort dreck like TFA for years. It would have been bad, but folks would have eaten it up.
For Disney, Star Wars exists to sell Lego sets and trips to the theme park.