And you think she's incapable of using a computer.
this narrative that a 65 years old person is so stupid that unless things are really easy and dumbed down, it's impossible for them to do anything, must die!
Old people have done a lot of things a lot more complex than signing up for Netflix. Which is a process unreasonably complicated, not complex.
Anyway, Stremio just works.
Kind of a terrible take to treat 67 as "old" in this regard.
What you're trying to retcon into the comment is that they really meant to say "My mother, who is not great with technology, can easily sign up for Netflix."
This is the way to communicate this in a non-ageist way. The age was thrown in as a clear attempt to draw on stereotypes that the elderly are poor with technology.
people in their 60s are the generation who literally INVENTED the technology we use now.
they struggle with the idiotic interfaces people in the 2000s have started using
especially touchscreens that are a specific subset of the entire HID, that are rarely better than any tactile input device [1]. Just like joysticks are better than joypads when precision is necessary.
My dad (82 years old) had no problems with windows 3.1 and 95 UI, now they mean nothing to him, because they literally don't! [2]
[1] I started having loss of vision due to my age going forward, instead of backwards, and I can't use my smartphone as proficiently as I used to anymore. I've been working in tech for 27 years, I have no issue at all with mechanical keyboards, but I struggle a lot when I have to write a sentence longer than 3 words on a smartphone, it has become unusable as soon as my eyesight has become less than perfect. Imagine having every other part of your body working imperfectly and you'll realize that the problem lies in the input interface, not in the person age.
[2] except XFCE or MATE
EDIT: grammar
Casual ageism is awesome.