So I’m not sure that the US is actually an exception.
So I’m not sure that the US is actually an exception.
Is the Belgian bank losing money compared to the UK one? Is there state intervention?
It’s basically hedged with long term bonds (Belgian or European) + a profit margin for the bank + risk based on your profile (age, health, employment history, …)
I guess UK banks are just hedging with shorter term bonds compared to Belgian ones.
They just don't tend to sell very well - when interest rates are low [1], it's not particularly appealing to fix at 2.69% for 10 years when you could fix at 1.94% for 5 years or 1.25% for 2 years.
And coming off the back of two decades of rock bottom interest rates, a lot of people didn't anticipate that they'd be remortgaging at a >5% interest rate.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20170921064712/https://www.barcl...
There are ways they use to hedge for this risk. I don't know if this is desirable, but that is probably the case in the US as well.
In my French mortgage, I have 25 year fixed part, no point paying down that one earlier since the fee would be the sum of all the fixed interest for 25 years (what you wrote). Then the other part is calculated every 3 months from EURIBOR (not that great now, just like elsewhere). This one I can pay partially or fully anytime without any fees.
My Swiss mortgage is completely different and unique beast (also split in 2 parts, one fixed 1 variable from Saron rate), nothing you can see anywhere else in the world IIRC. 20% cash downpayment as usually, then in next 15 years I need to pay off another 15% of the property, and rest is just interest payments. We'll never fully own the property, and its very disadvantageous tax-wise to own it(so nobody here does it if they can avoid it). Swiss invented an additional property tax (Imputed rental value) that is calculated from hypothetical rent you could extract from given property, and you are taxed also from this theoretical income, even if its your primary residence.