I know first hand that this industry is a GRIND and most existing tech solutions are bloated and inefficient legacy systems so I think there is definitely space to disrupt the industry. Best of luck!
I know first hand that this industry is a GRIND and most existing tech solutions are bloated and inefficient legacy systems so I think there is definitely space to disrupt the industry. Best of luck!
Operating as a licensed lender would allow you to have higher APR thresholds. For example in IL, unlicensed caps at 9% (which is not always economical), while licensed allows you to lend at 36%
If you handle getting the licenses for the company that is super valuable
for in-state offices, there are 3rd party agencies to work with to set those up. also recently, some states like NV have passed laws to remove this bottleneck.
I am also curious on the official answer though!
1. Who has the lending licenses? Given the website footer disclaimer says Pier isn't the lender. I would guess it's either a banking partnership or a license arrangement carried over from Stilt/JG Wentworth?
2. How does Pier think of itself in relation to someone like LoanPro (who from my industry conversations has had a lot of positive momentum as the best origination software) and the other origination/servicing platforms? I gather the idea is a bundled "origination + decision + servicing" platform.
LoanPro doesn't do the decision engine piece itself, but from what I gathered it was partially due to the precisely the complexity and compliance risks parent commenter noted.
Definitely best of luck to the team, as the space can always use better software than what I've seen at older institutions.
2) a lot of existing solutions such as loanpro are good at supporting "vanilla" credit products, but tend to struggle with "chocolate & sprinkles on top" like configurations. we've talked to so many companies who told us that after they purchased these existing solutions, but had to spend another 3-6mths+ of engineer resources to configure it to their use case, and even that is still quite brittle with more manual involvements.
these configurations impact the entire loan cycle from origination, APR calcs, state rules and many more. for example, repayment cycles pegged to salary schedules, irregular 1st payment date, balloon payments, min payment for lines of credit, etc.
Our credit application API will return an error if you try to approve a set of offer terms for a user that violates their state's limits.
We also have a couple utility endpoints that help with coverage and compliance checks: 1) a coverage endpoint that returns the basic limits for each state and 2) an endpoint that allows you to verify if a set of offer terms are compliant for a given state.