Real-Estate Commissions Could Be the Next Fee on the Chopping Block
wsj.com
wsj.com
I was buying a home in a desired neighborhood. My agent would call days after the property came on the market. I set up notifications on Redfin and was getting instant notifications. I would call him and request we see a home.
As someone knowledgeable about construction the shit agents say is often wrong. It’s in their interest to sell you the home.
Need a marketplace for private sellers. Someone comes out to take pics at fixed cost and maybe does the description. Lawyer helps will all the legal crap. And the seller is 6% richer.
Our second (seller) agent was a godsend. She managed to get a <24 turnaround hour repair after I fell through the ceiling in the kitchen to keep our inspection on sale on track. (Someone neglected to nail down a beam in the attic…)
Our third agent (buyer) saved the day, we woke up January 1 and our dream home went off market and we’d booked a trip for January 2 to visit the home 5 hours away. He tracked down the original owners and arranged for us to visit the now off market house, ultimately getting the owners to sell after they decided to throw in the towel. He also handled all the insanity while we prepared our move from afar.
If you’re a cash-investment buyer I’m sure a marketplace with minimal legal fees is the ticket. If you’re a random family stressed to death by the ordeal, I don’t necessarily mind paying the fee.
There is already a marketplace for private sellers: https://www.forsalebyowner.com
If your time is worth $0 then sure, maybe FISBO or your private marketplace will work for you but I think you’re discounting the work involved, the value a good agent provides, and how beneficial it is to have a non-emotional party between you and the seller/buyer.
2. Look for "flat-fee" realtor services. They will legally be your realtor, post on MLS, but you have to do the legwork.
Both of these have service fees, but hundreds of dollars, not thousands/tens of thousands.
They're the worst parasites, but they've rigged the game so that people pay tens of thousands of dollars in commissions for someone to do a couple hours of paperwork and tell them whatever they need to hear to close the sale.
Just talked with him about an estate sale where he had to get 17 signatures from various heirs to sell a house. One of the heirs was a 90 year old aunt of the original owner. The aunt had died during the real estate transaction which meant my dad had to track down her 5 children since they were now somehow part of the transaction.
In another sale, he had to sell off a bunch of farm equipment that owner and buyer wanted nothing to do with and that he couldn't find a way to deal with (without just eating the cost of having it scrapped)
In another one he had to navigate a three-way sale where a buyer also wanted the abutting land that a second owner was willing to sell but only to this buyer and it involved money in escrow for survey and sub parcel fees and multiple properties in limbo while three parties all worked it out.
For a lot of real estate transactions I imagine the premise of this article is true. But there is certainly value that can be added from a good agent.
It should, as the rental fees affect the lower and middle income people (who rent) more than owners and buyers.
Paying someone 12-15 percent of year rent for doing absolutely nothing is borderline criminal.
As long as you understand you're advertising to real estate agents and not buyers, its easy to sell a house. They need to see from the listing that they won't have to do any work to sell the house other than show it to a client. We offered the standard commission to the buyers agent.
We still had to get an agent to buy, though. Couldn't find a good one, so we held our nose and did the work ourselves, using the agent for house access.
They will take private listings and put their watermark on the photos and list it under their own number.
When you call them, they have to call the landlord to arrange a showing. Then we both stand outside the apartment waiting for the landlord to show up. Basically they're a third wheel in the whole transaction.
Half the time the thing is already leased and they didn't take it off their website.
On top of it all they take the commission from the buyer. It makes no sense.
At least leasing agents in the US do a lot more than playing phone tag with the buyer and the seller.
They make soooooooooo much money with current arrangement.
I believe it would take a lot of capital to kick it off, mainly trying to establish a 2 sided market place. The whole multiple MLS entities (per state) all seem to be cartels and realtors are scared off them (as they don't want to be booted off).
I've spent considerable time thinking about ways to create a wedge (I walk my dog a lot!), but it's hard without creating another MLS clone.
Can't read the FTA as it's pay-walled and archivePH thinks I'm not human.
I really don't understand how this can operate in a capitalistic/non-monopoly-favoring society.
FWIW— I was the CTO of a real estate startup for five years where the whole mission was to get rid of the middle man (like the MLS). It didn’t work and in the end the company had to eventually pivot.