This is what the year actually looks like (2018)
nrkbeta.no
nrkbeta.no
I wonder if you made a dating app that asked these sorts of questions ("what shape is a year?", "can you read a book while counting?", etc) if the answers would be a relevant factor for determining compatibility.
The reasoning is that it closest matches reality, "cyclically rotating around the sun and moving with the seasons, as well as forever propelling ourselves forward into the future with permanent changes".
There's a romance to it that I've always adored, as well as dammit it just makes SENSE
That's how I also visualize numbers as well - always as notches on a number line. Whenever someone mentions a number, I immediately picture it there. It helps with comparisons and subtractions because I can immediately see the distance between values.
I was born in Germany, where the country shuts down between Christmas to New Year, and so it makes a natural cut in the year. (Though when I was in school, the summer holidays were more important as a divider.)
In my adopted home of Singapore, instead Chinese New Year is really important. But because of a lack of clear seasons, there is much less of a natural year-long structure to time. (Interestingly, the school year here aligns with the calendar year.)
It started with September on the left, and it ended with August on the right. To this day, whenever I think of a year, I picture it like that timeline.
Relatedly, I've recently put a line in my .bashrc to display the ISO week number (date +%V) in addition to the traditional date. Knowing that we're in week 42 of the year somehow helps me get a better sense time passing than knowing it is the third Wednesday in October. In general I think the world lives in weeks rather than months and it's a little unfortunate that our date system obscures this.
Indeed, I've been aware for many years that my spatial visualization of the year was formed in kindergarten, from the board that had a ring of 12 laminated paper cupcakes, each with the names of the kids in class born in that month. December was at the 3:00 position, thus permanently wiring it there in my brain.
All that said, my mind somehow added a dimension over time, turning the loop into a sort of loose helix with the past below (and intermittently attached to corresponding real-world time-places like classrooms or offices) and the future somewhere above.
One of the more interesting visualizations of the year was a colleague who saw it as a coil, so cyclic but also with a forward motion.
Seasons are also interesting: my seasons are wedges of the cyclic year, but som I've discussed this with have the seasons removed from their representation of the year and have seasons tabular instead.
In Denmark using week numbers is very normal. People will know what week's are vacation weeks, and ask you what your plans are for week 40 etc.
I wonder if this is common in other countries too?
But only very recently a couple of friends of mine mis-communicated because they had a different week in mind ("so how about we meet this Wednesday?" - "I thought you wrote calendar week 33, not 32, I'm away on seminar all week.")
I much prefer "Hey, let's meet up on the week of November 6th" (the date being the Monday of the week).
But as you say, that might be something common in specific places of work.
Of course they ended up with circles!
We use the ISO definition of the week, the US uses something else.
The second nightmare is the week iof difference in daylight saving time (in Europe we switch a week earlier or later vs the US, I do not remember anymore)
It is granular enough (~52 weeks) to give good (rough) estimations and is is not difficult to manage (compared to 365 days for instance)
For me, when comparing or estimating timescales, months are numbers in a range, and I mean numbers, not points on a line. When deciding whether to do something in February or June or October, there are significant memories, colors, smells and pictures associated with each, but again, no spatial model.
I am not saying that this necessarily must lead to geometric metaphors, but if you are somewhere where "a day" looks more or less the same independent of the season it makes more sense to tie to your own experience
I can imagine the year as a circle, since we’ve had circles like that in school.
But there’s not generally any figure that pops into my head when I think about it.
I can relate to the complicated pictures some have though. It feels like different parts of the year have different sizes and angles to them, so could probably draw a shape that feels right to me
Summer
Spring Fall
Winter
Now I didn't put month names here, but being in the northern hemisphere is easy to place.> I asked our readers: "If the year is a circle – where’s March and December in your mind?"
The purpose of this study wasn't to find out if people see the year circularly or linearly - the circle was built in as a prior assumption.
I have zero data but I'd be shocked if most people don't view the year linearly.
> ‘The year is an even circle’ is sufficient for 70 % of us. > But 28 % have entered free text.
And there is a further breakdown of the other answers like ellipse, line, square, etc.
So, at least in this survey, very few people view the year linearly, just 7%.
Myself, I visualize the year as an ellipse.
As for the year, I'm imagining a circle, but with January / December at the bottom. It may have something to do with how the plants are "in the ground".
Really fascinating how we differ.
I keep learning new spatial relationships every time I ask! I drew mine here: https://omarshehata.me/notebook/my_number_forms
the past is back to the left.
I can't picture it any other way, though. Clockwise???
I built this so that I would stop expecting winter to end soon after winter solstice, no my friend, the night is just getting started.
( I'm in the southern hemisphere btw if you are seeing am instead of pm that'll be why )
I like these questions of internal representation. Like “what color is Wednesday?” Yellow, obviously, but I suspect disagreement.
If I had to pick a shape, it would be a zig-zag.
No doubt that this is influenced by wall calendars.
Scandinavians traditionally celebrate both the summer and winter solstices, and the change in light over the course of the year is dramatic at that latitude. To me, that would best be illustrated with a sine wave.
The integers up to a few thousand (and the big multiples like thousand, million, lakh etc) have a definite shape to me. I remember trying to draw it as a kid (rather unsuccessfully). But when doing simple arithmetic (including simple rationals) I simply look up the answer. My college roommate was interested and observed that I literally flick my eyes around to find the answer. Learning the times tables always seemed like a weird idea — I just answered the questions when asked.
I assume a lot of people do the same.
Another cool thing I've noticed is that my visual perspective of the year shifts with the year. During the first quarter, I view the circle from outside the Q1 portion of the ring with the distinct understanding that I'm viewing it "upside down". And as the months go by, so does my position in the circle and my perspective on the rest of the year.
I find it weird and a bit arrogant that the author didn't open with some explanation.
And if you do have such a visual image, do you use it for anything or does it just sit there like a piece of art?
In our mind, the past, present, and future are 3d or 2d relations. The week, a month, your lifespan all have some spatial "shape", or order at the least. I'm no expert, but I am pretty sure this is not Synesthesia like the article implies.
"My" inner year is a counter-clockwise circle. But my week is a strip, even though week loops like years. My life is a downwards strip, I guess because I'll die someday. History itself is an upward strip, because time itself will never end (presumably).
> I have long enjoyed asking candidate programmers, "Where is next November?" If the question is too cryptic, then, "Tell me about your mental model of the calendar." The really good programmers have strong spatial senses; they usually have geometric models of time; and they quite often understand the first question without elaboration. They have highly individualistic models.
I will say that long years spent in, or associated with, academia means that the start of a year is irrevocably associated with September or so. January is 'meh', but autumn is alive with fresh possibility.
The question together with the visualizations of the answers assume that the circle is still, and upright.
In my mind the circle is flat on the ground, and I’m moving around it counter-clockwise. There’s no “up”. I’m always on whatever the current month is, facing inwards, seeing the past six months on my left and the next six months on my right.
I had never realized this was so complex in my mind.
JAN → FEB → MAR ↩ (new row)
APR → MAY → JUN → JUL → AUG
↓
SEPT
↓
OCT
↓
NOV → DEC ...I read somewhere from one of his collegues (parafrased) "Of course he's crazy, but not in the bad way"
I suppose 'eccentric vs crazy' is a on a subjective sliding scale
- Jan to June on one row - July, August September in a column under June - October to December on one row, which is on the same row or next year's Jan.
All that left to right.
Have I just described a (weird) wall calendar?
I assumed everyone thought like this! Circular years just seems super strange to me.
* I know.
It makes more sense if you count both from zero. 12 is 0, January is 0.
It's a post by a Norwegian author based mainly on data received from other Norwegians, so...
> are these people actually saying they see these images when they think about and use the concept of a year
I do (not a circle but definitely a visualisation I see in my head).
I don't know how reliable the data is, nor how well understood the topic is, but most studies I've seen on this do show the majority of people visually visualise concepts in their head; not universally, there's always people who don't visualise at all, but primary differences discussed in these type of results tend to be whether people's visualisations are vivid or vague or something different.
a) every time they have to operate the "year" concept they see this mental image
b) when they deliberately want to create an image out of the concept of a "year", they see a circle
If (a) I'm probably wildly aphantasiac. If (b) this is only conceptual art.
You spend some decades thinking "counting sheep" was meant figuratively; you discover that was not the case.
Firstly, this study explicitly prompted people first to visualise years as a circle, so there's no guarantee respondents do this every time - so to answer your MCQ, the answer here would most likely be (b).
However, if you were to ask whether people visualise something (be it a circle or some different visualisation) every time they have to operate the "year" concept, I suspect the answer would be (a).
TL;DR: Aphantasia likely
fwiw, Ed Catmull's Disney survey on this topic is interesting (referenced in the wiki article above)
Perhaps it has to do with my bilingual upbringing: juggling with language was my main job for a longggggg time.