The sad decline of cursive
wsj.com
wsj.com
Part of corresponding that way is becoming familiar with each other's handwriting. This can be laborious but it is rewarding in its own right.
When I was at the university I had a lengthy correspondence with a friend who had, even at that tender age, a well exercised hand: thick expressive staccato lines in pitch black fountain pen ink. They looked more like the outlines of spiky mountain ranges than words. Deciphering her handwriting would mean you had to go slowly, letting the words sink in one by one. Which only enhanced their impact for she wrote achingly beautiful letters. Her handwriting befitted her fearless character, complemented her writing and forced me to pay close attention. Try saying that about an e-mail in Helvetica 12pt.
I admire how some people can draw flawless cursive letters but calligraphy doesn't seem to be my cup of tea. Would be nice if computers had support for it, though.
Gen Z never learned to read cursive: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32884213
What Is Killing Cursive? Ballpoints. Probably: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37571180
The importance of handwriting is now better understood: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37909756
Is the author at least 70 years old? Or was his parochial school behind the times?
"By the mid-20th century, the Zaner-Bloser Method was the most popular style of penmanship instruction in the US, while interest in the Palmer Method had been declining from the 1950s" says https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaner-Bloser_(teaching_script) and "When the D'Nealian Method was introduced in 1978, it quickly became popular and led to a significant decline in the use of the previously leading Zaner-Bloser Method" says https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%27Nealian .
The author was born in 1950 says https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Queenan_(author) so most likely just behind the times.
> As for the stately, elegant penmanship of the kind I was taught in grade school, just forget it. Beautiful handwriting is a thing of the past.
For elegant penmanship, see Spencerian script at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencerian_script , where you'll also read "President James A. Garfield called the Spencerian script, "the pride of our country and the model of our schools.""
Before then was English roundhand, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_hand .
The Palmer Method is a less elegant script so people could write faster and compete with the typewriter.
In other developments, I see recursive coming out on a resurgence in some self-help circles - marketed as a tool to unlock your inner potential, relieve stress/anxiety - just shows that forget about something long enough and you can relabel it to make some money.
AFAIK its usage isn't widespread.
Here’s the thing(s) that I’ve gone full analog on:
1. Reminders. Use a small moleskin notebook in my pocket and cross things off when they’re done. Really satisfying, that crossing-off.
2. Notes. I just use a tear away pad for notes and a self-inking date stamp. As the notes stack up, if I don’t use them in a few months then I didn’t need them and I toss them.
3. Books. I have stopped buying kindle/ebooks and now have paper books. They are far less expensive now and I can browse them both on the shelf, and whichever highlights I’ve made very quickly. Ebooks are a scourge, a censor’s delight, and also are useless for quickly finding information unless you have a keyword etc. The Kindle apps are especially useless for anyone who wants to do serious thinking/research/scanning.
4. Brainstorming. I have a chalkboard, an old one, got it for $20. I put it on casters so I can wheel it around the room. Great for planning and social discussion too.
5. Letters/notes. I can leave them for my wife or write notes to my friends and they’re delighted. Why did we stop doing this?
6. Letterpress! I bought a small tabletop press and a ton of old lead type. I have yet to really master it yet but have made some cool tests/samples for gifts. I think my whole setup cost less than $1000, I have maybe 200 typesets/weights/sizes.
Improving your penmanship and doing things analog is quite satisfying. You can keep your futurecel techbro futurist nonsense, when the grid has failed and the surveillance panopticon has imprisoned you, I’ll be happily writing and distributing Constitution 2.0 ;-)
1: https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/the-sad-decline-of-cursiveespe... (link from https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/372943-the-sa...)
Very analogous to the numerous articles both on WSJ and elsewhere complaining about "ugly" architecture.
- inability to hand-write
- inability to solve an equation system or to calculate the zero points of a polynomial
- inability to read a book cover to cover and to summarize its contents
- inability to listen to a 2 hour lecture concentrated and to take notes
- inability to conduct a scholarly literature search on a topic (other than coming back with 8 blue Web links)
- inability to find the library or to use it other than for drinking coffee with friends
- inability to read a daily newspaper or weekly news magazine to stay informed about current events
- inability to milk a cow
- inability to chisel messages on a stone tablet
- inability to navigate the seas using only the stars
- inability to light a lantern without spilling the oil
- inability to decipher a message sent via smoke signals
- inability to troubleshoot a malfunctioning sundial
- inability to sharpen a quill
But the comparison of those with the parent's list, as if to imply the parent's items are equally useless or "deprecated", is indeed very troubling...
And that's just a first level comparison, a meta level would include the huge waste enabled by a real-time inter-connected world, over one with limited local signalling abilities.
compared thus, your list is nonsense: a careless slapdash composed in a quick, gotcha-y response to a well-deserved criticism.
I haven't used the library to check out a book in years and I rarely write something by hand except to take notes. And despite me having taken post-graduate level pure math-lectures, I will struggle to solve an equation system that involves concrete numbers instead of variables that also don't cancel, i am just astonishingly bad at mental arithmetic.
I disagree for some, like "inability to conduct a scholarly literature search on a topic (other than coming back with 8 blue Web links)" and "inability to read a daily newspaper or weekly news magazine to stay informed about current events". Some don't care and some do, so they either research or try to be as lazy as possible. I can imagine it's always been this way.
Often overlooked skills in the modern world...