Where is "why" in this repetitive review? Also, what is the values of bluntly repeating in a more aggressive style vs bluntly saying the same thing once in a more professional manner while also explaining the reason (lack of details)

> First off, the simple stuff: the commit messages are worthless. Having

   check seal for mmap(2)

as the commit message is not even remotely acceptable, to pick one random example from the series (7/8).