Hacker News Reader

Comment by nfriedly | Hacker News Reader

Honestly, being "willing to grind" might be a good thing to target if it's a good proxy for being willing to do the work.

However, I agree with the general sentiment that almost nobody is doing the research to ensure their interview process selects for the things they actually want.

View on HN

I’m willing to grind if you present me with a real life problem you need solving. I’m not willing to run on a hamster wheel, it seems illogical to me.

1. Learning algorithms and practicing leetcode is not actually useless. A deep knowledge of algorithms falls under the category of high value knowledge that is not frequently needed. Its still high value when its needed and you cant predict when it is needed.

2. Its not a hamster wheel because you get a high paying job for your efforts

My sentiment too. These Leetcode style websites will take an algorithm and then come up with a contorted problem that can be solved with that problem. Often the problem is not even worded precisely but people who have been wasting time on solving random problems can see the patterns apparently.

And therefore you are not an employee they want.

These companies don't want an employee who starts to question "why" things should be done or why things are important. Demonstrating that you are willing to apply yourself at something objectively useless simply because you are required to is a huge plus.

This is the situation at most big companies.

Weeding out candidates who aren't willing to ride the hamster wheel is a huge point of leetcode.

> Honestly, being "willing to grind" might be a good thing to target if it's a good proxy for being willing to do the work.

Grinding is a poor proxy for work ethic. It is a good proxy for submissiveness.

You might be right, but I think it could be both.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com