I'll just keep renting, I guess, since it makes no difference.
I'll just keep renting, I guess, since it makes no difference.
That land is provided ongoing services, security, and utilities which cost money each year to maintain. Ownership is not some fundamental law of physics. It's a made up concept which is defined however the society you live in wants to define it.
Yeah, and I already pay PG&E, Comcrap, and whoever else is maintaining those services, I don't need to pay it again to the IRS. The IRS wouldn't do jack shit on land I own.
Do you think all these things just magically exist?
Hence, owning property isn't attractive to me at all right now unless they can stop taxing it.
Where I live we see tremendous value in the property taxes we pay. The kids get a quality education, the parks are well maintained, the streets are good and the walkways are clean. It’s not cheap but it’s all accounted for in a public ledger. And if you don’t like it you’re able to run for office to change it.
Look - I’m with you when it comes to government inefficiency, corruption, etc. the further from home the worse it is. At least property taxes go into my community and we directly benefit. It makes a place desirable.
In this case the IRS collecting LVT is just recouping the investment they have made improving your land for you.
There’s no way that the tax burden offsets the equity you would build by owning property vs renting.
95% of my mortgage payment goes toward paying down principal on the loan, which is essentially value I get to keep. Not to mention that my housing costs are much more fixed compared to rent.
Paying rent provides zero value retention in the long run, its only real benefit is flexibility.
This is like saying:
> Harry Potter is the best story ever written and I have no interest in ever reading it.
Property rights are made of consensus, so I'd recommend you stop consenting to the short end of the stick.