Snowbanks are set to get whiter – offsetting climate change's effects
nature.com
nature.com
Global warming has reduced snowfall and accelerated snowmelt in mountainous regions, threatening the supply of fresh water for two billion people worldwide. Snow melts even faster if it is covered with sooty particles of black carbon, which are produced by the burning of wood and fossil fuels.
Dalei Hao at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Washington, and his colleagues used simulations to assess how much soot will land on snow in the next several decades. They project a reduction in black-carbon pollution in snow-covered regions across the Northern Hemisphere between 2015 and the end of the twenty-first century.
Even if global carbon emissions continue to rise for the next half-century, the amount of solar radiation the snow absorbs because of soot and dust pollution will be 62.3% less by 2100 than when the snow was dirtier. The whitening of the snowpack is expected to slow its loss and increase the availability of fresh water, the scientists say.
There are just so many variables and effects to consider - modelling this behaviour to any level of precision seems very hard.
Just we should keep in mind that the results are far from certain.
So the effect of cleaner air is more warming, but less snow melt? Probably not.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.7665...
Surely not all, we should be that lucky!
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41732-6
>changes in snow over the Tibetan Plateau will alleviate future snowpack loss due to climate change by 52.1 ± 8.0% and 8.0 ± 1.1% at the end of the century for the two scenarios, mainly due to reduced black carbon contamination
> unless it is misleading or linkbait