Extroverts more likely to resist vaccines, study shows

Raw case rates normalized by pop size from the UK: vaccinated people were getting COVID at 3x-4x the rate of the unvaccinated by the time they stopped reporting the figures. Natural immunity was actually much better than the vaccine because it developed whole-virus protection to all the proteins not just the spike, so you don't get Hoskin's Effect and variants find it harder to evade.

Putting this particular mRNA, a gene, into your body modifies the set of genes in your body, because now there is a new one, and it evokes a response in a way that eating the dna, also genes, of asparagus or a cow does not.

The point stands, at that point, fear mongering aside, the Covid risk profile was pretty well understood, the risk profile of the experimental gene therapy was not.

Regardless of what you want to call it, it turns out to have been a bad idea for reasons of “original antigenic sin”, immune system disruptions due to heightened levels of IgG4 or some other factors leading to injected people becoming more susceptible to the virus, and the host of issues that may or may not be tied to the gene modifying but to the lipid delivery mechanism or something else, heart issues, fertility disruptions, shingles, Guillain–Barré syndrome, etc. etc.

Whatever terminology you want to use the winning move was to not play the game.

Do you know how many countries that once used them have now barred the use of the mRNA injections for at least a portion of their population?

—————

IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37243095/

You are repeating how the tech works in theory, not how the vaccines work in reality.

In reality, the vaccines can do this. That's because the "process 2" manufacturing that was switched to post-approval scales much better but yields vaccines heavily contaminated with DNA, not just RNA. If you smuggle DNA into cells using the lipid nanoparticle tricks then it can be incorporated into your own DNA yielding never ending spike protein production and immune tolerance.

There's testimony by a scientist who sequenced residue from vials and discovered the problem here, but it was suspected even before that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

He says he would no longer take the vaccines knowing what he knows now.

There are a whole bunch of case reports where this appears to have happened. Patients who end up always testing positive for spike protein for example, despite not being infected with SARS-CoV-2.

> The whole thing reads like the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

It's actually the opposite. Over-educated people constantly confuse the map for the terrain due to a naive belief in the angel-like nature of everyone in the same social class as themselves. Then they assume anyone who disagrees must be misinformed.

The people who are most pro-COVID vaccine are, in my experience, people with degrees who also know very little about it beyond what they've been told by pop sci media and public health authorities. The idea that what they've told might not be true is just inconceivable to them, and the luxury belief of intellectual superiority to the rubes is just too tempting to pass up. People who are skeptical are engaging directly with the collected evidence, not just what theory says that evidence should be.

Injecting mRNA, a gene, into your body modifies the set of genes in your body. Due to the new gene in your body your cells produce a protein they otherwise would not have. The reason anybody ever thought this was a good idea was to mitigate against an overblown risk from infection by a novel virus. People’s wariness toward the virus was understandable though given the many strange questions around it and the bizarre, unprecedented, inhumane, response provoked in many countries.

This whole notion of putting a gene in the body to evoke a response doesn’t haven’t any long track record of understanding behind it, therefore terming it experimental makes sense.

Thus, experimental gene modification.

I’d guess there might be some fancy statistics term to describe the intuitive calculation for some of us high iq critical thinkers that said don’t add on a potentially very large upside of risk onto something for the purposes of possibly mitigating a very small range of downside risk.

And now with all the complications arising from the shots that intuition was clearly correct. Even if all the issues hadn’t become apparent it would still be the right call for those with that limited range of downside risk from the virus to have not tacked on additional unknown risk from the injections.

Do you know how many countries that once used the mRNA injections have now barred their use for some or most of their populations?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874623/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18075477/

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10519-015-973...

a) HCQ must be given early (~3-4 days or less after symptoms begin) hopefully before the virus has significantly damaged the mouth, throat and lungs. Once the viral damage is done then HCQ efficacy declines rapidly.

b) a zinc supplement is given with HCQ. HCQ helps zinc to enter the cell whereupon the zinc halts/slows viral replication.

c) an antibiotic (e.g., azithromycin) is given with HCQ, not to stop the virus but to halt opportunistic bacterial infections that might otherwise enter tissue damaged by the virus.

So you can see why many hospitalization studies showed HCQ ineffective: those studies waited far too long to use HCQ.

It is claimed that such delays are a technique used in drug trials to discard possible inexpensive drugs and promote other patentable and therefore profitable drugs. See R.F. Kennedy Jr.'s book for details:

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=THE+REAL+ANTHONY+FAUCI

The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

You choose whether to be vaccinated or not and regardless of whether you have been infected or not, getting vaccinated improves your resistance.