But with collaboration, sometimes weeks of work can be cut out if one discovers the right work to do. And even better if a new direction or idea can be found. This is all of course technically possible remotely, but it doesn't happen in the general case because we didn't evolve to work by ourselves without f2f contact.
> worldwide, nearly instantaneous communication
This isn't nearly as good of a point as you think it is.
> or even monogamy
Speak for yourself.
> This isn't nearly as good of a point as you think it is.
Why not? If we evolved to relate to a small tribe and now are exposed to huge numbers of people then I'd say there's proof humans can and are adapting.
And you didn't respond to my point about being as effective. This is all relative to baseline in office working.
Taking your logic further, why bother with anything? Why even work remotely? Just don't work. Nothing is as important as putting food on the table and a roof over your head, so become a builder and a farmer.
I actually think that there's room here for a hybrid. Have one track for remote engineers and one for in person. Remote engineers get different work, they generally have a lower ceiling in career potential. In exchange they get what they want, they work mostly by themselves with videoconf/slack as aid.
Of course there's always the exceptions. If you're the top 0.0001% in domain experts in a field, you can do whatever you want.
Citation needed. Most of the people I talk to prefer a hybrid setup - 2/3 days from home, 2/3 days in office. For office days, an obvious caveat is that the entire team has to be present on those days to realize the benefits.
> If businesses want to attract talent, they need to accept this.
Looking around here in SV, plenty of businesses seem to be attracting great talent even with RTO policies.
In fact we have more silos since this idiot stepped in.