If the first solar entrepreneur hadn't been kidnapped?
techxplore.com
techxplore.com
Not really, it's tied to how much land you own. Which would exacerbate current housing imbalance issues.
But yes, more one-dollar-one-vote than one-person-one-vote.
Obviously this was for 1909's power consumption. But imagine having the constraint of "The average household has x square feet of solar generation capabilities" when creating an electrical appliance.
The manufacturers of the appliances would've had to care a lot more about energy efficiency, bragging about it as a feature of the newest model, instead of taking for granted that electricity would be cheap and plentiful...
I think my backyard metallurgy is not very precise though. Also, my current way of holding the sample might be all kinds of bad. So some more messing around is needed
[1] https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2021/10/how-to-build-a-low...
> Cove accused a former investor, Frederick W. Huestis of organizing the kidnapping. After the kidnapping, the business shuttered
I do like the WhatIf? angle of the article, though it would have been nice to see a graph with actual solar trends vs the author's whatif trend. Still, placing the nexus point of Solar/Oil 20 years earlier doesn't seem that impressive, given the 40 year headstart.
Link to the thought experiment:
https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-10...
But when I myself learn documents and talked to witnesses (or with these inventors), in nearly all cases I seen crazy person, who cannot deal with real life tasks and trying to play role of "genius inventor", and gather money from around (read about 4D investors in toilet paper entrepreneur), and cannot make any stable economy.
And when I analyze their works (sure many prefer to make all their crazy things top secret, but sometimes leak few things), I have seen all sorts of perpetuum mobile, faked science documents, demonstrative decline of strict accounting (to make robbery more easy), dramatic crazy stories.