Apple's new video reactions are making therapy awkward
theverge.com
theverge.com
- the struggle of everyone moving to remote work
- the perceived inability of the older generation to keep up
- the perceived ridiculousness of some of the features tech companies were including to try to win the arms race (even though as the article correctly points out this particular feature is decades old, it symbolized a wider trend)
- a somewhat humorous spin on all of the above
And lawyers were all doing their calls from wherever they were. Often in their cars. One lawyer doing his court appearances while shopping at Whole Foods.
It takes something that would otherwise be an irregular and stressful chore and makes it predictable and pleasant and something I look forward to -- and that helps make therapy a useful tool where I can pick things to work on, process how I'm doing, and plan next steps on a regular basis.
I also think it's worth noting that the point of therapy is not really to form or reinforce a friendship with a therapist? This isn't like a long distance romantic or platonic relationship, my therapist is not a buddy. Therapy is a tool. I am not trying to form an emotional connection with my therapist; my therapist is there to help me process and plan and work on parts of my life that I want to improve. That's not to say that the human part of therapy isn't important, but it's important because of how it services that goal.
A therapist is not a substitute for other human interaction, it's designed to be a one-way relationship. A therapist should not be the primary way that anyone is fulfilling their needs for human intimacy or vulnerability; what a therapist can do is help you identify if you're not meeting those needs and help you form an actionable plan for you to meet them better in your regular life.
You seem to have a problem with projection. Have you considered seeing a therapist for this problem? If in-person therapy is inaccessible to you, have you considered teletherapy? It has benefits over traditional therapy, especially for those struggling with mental illnesses like agoraphobia or depression. Depression, an insidious disease, makes it hard to even get out of bed and off Netflix. Teletherapy is able to help in those cases as it is accessible without leaving bed or the house. I hope we can agree that some help is better than no help.
Even if a couple lives near each other, I could totally imagine 1 or both in the relationship thinking in-person therapy is too dire an action to take but telehealth seems more doable. Better some therapy than none right? It could also be that in-person therapy is significantly more expensive than what a couple is able/willing to pay.
[0]: https://cdn.masto.host/mastodonie/cache/media_attachments/fi...
Why not Facetime?
I bill through the headway platform as an example and they require a hipaa compliant telehealth platform with BAA for processing. In addition I believe my contract with Aetna specifies the same although it’s been awhile since I’ve reviewed it tbf.
an interesting question that comes up for me is whether these companies are harvesting content of meetings and chats for training models and whatnot. The BAA is a (small) protection for myself in case it turns out that zoom is training their AI assistant on meeting chats or closed captioning without participant consent. Although I would hope that the liability in that scenario would mostly fall on zoom as that’s really an abuse on their part.
Bottom line though is if your therapist is using FaceTime/discord/etc they are ignorant to hipaa protocols or not practicing ethically, both are concerning. Very frustrating from a consumer perspective because how the fuck are you supposed to know what is and isn’t hipaa compliant. It’s silly to have to research whether your clinician is using a regulatory compliant platform but here we are, I guess
For what it’s worth the lighting and background blur effects are really good, much better than the tuning built into Zoom. I’m leaving the reactions on too for the comedy for now but I’ll probably turn them off eventually.
Found instructions here: https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/use-video-conferenc...
I haven’t investigated much further but it’s possible the settings are per-app or something.
For me, apparently I like to stick out my thumb and then index finger, when I say "first (second, third)", which triggers thumbs up first and baloons second. Really? Totally unhelpful and awkward.
I think these are completely different things.
Edited to add: FWIW they were on the latest macOS and I wasn’t.
That’s the problem with this new feature. It’s on by default and alters the feed for other software.
It’s not all bad though. The filters are actually pretty nice. But expressions, on the other hand, get accidentally triggered often and really shouldn’t be gesture operated (or at least disabled by default)
Apple still makes some of the best hardware I know, but gosh, the software they make...
What if the operating system started to bleep out swear words from the microphone? Or blurring out obscene gestures?
Sure, make the software available on install, or even prompt it's configuration and opt in on installation.
But it's not and should not be the responsibility of the OS to apply effects or manipulate or alter the data of the hardware.
This position is unworkable in so many cases, but it's especially so for cameras. The data coming out of these sensors is awful, and requires several computationally-expensive passes to clean up. Once you grant that there is a spectrum of data manipulation where reasonable defaults must be selected, you grant that your stated position is unrealistic.
Right up there in the menu bar glowing green for you
If you still don't understand: this feature and setting used to not exist. Now it does. And it's on by default. So, it has been turned on for everyone.
This is a thing that used to not exist, and now it exists for everyone using this OS. And they will not know what it is or how to turn it off unless they are told by someone else.
One day, you get into your car and start driving. But the horn honks whenever you press on the accelerator. An angry drivers rolls down their window and yells at you: "What are you, stupid? The car company went into all of the cars last night and modified them. You need to open the trunk and disconnect the 'honk while accelerating wire'! Jeeze, how can you be so clueless?"
In software development, a lot of new features are on by default. If Apple hid every new feature behind a on/off setting, no one would enable new features, ever.
I really love Mac’s new effect of clicking the desktop which moves all windows away to see your files underneath. Had that feature been added and off by default, there’s zero chance I would have ever enabled it.
Yes, I’ve had the reactions inadvertently appear in business calls recently, but it generally just results in amusement from everyone in the meeting. Although I suppose it would kind of suck to accidentally activate the laser show effect if I’m being interviewed on live TV. (Although anyone being interviewed like that should be prepped by the show to get all the settings right for broadcast)
That's because they hide the on/off settings. Discoverability is no longer considered a worthwhile design goal. Apple's attitude comes down to, "You're either with it, or you're not."
(Yes, that's as inherently exclusionary as it sounds. It's astonishing to watch the irony elude nominally-progressive companies like Apple.)
Anytime a potentially privacy disrespecting setting is hidden by barriers, I withhold the benefit of the doubt when it comes to trillion dollar companies.
I am sorry, they do? Because afaik on iOS, it is Settings->Bluetooth->on/off toggle. It is in the top 3 entries once you open Settings app, no need to even search for it.
Same with WiFi. And both of them stay off if you disable them from there. It is a temporary “off” state if you turn it off from the control center (which is the non-obvious flow compared to plain settings approach; however, it tells you that), but permanent if you do it through settings app.
So, being in control of my own thinking adult destiny? How horrible.
This is more likely the decision of a product team that needed to measure engagement on a new 'feature' and set it on by default to pick up data right away.
That isn’t on by default though. Upon upgrade you’re presented with an option as to whether you want to turn it on or leave it off.
Whereas this camera gesture change has no warning. It’s new and unexpected behaviour.
Strange that there wasn’t something similar for the camera effects feature which seems like a more substantial piece of functionality than a setting for moving windows around.
"So, I'm here to prep you for the TV interview, let us begin by checking and making sure the stupidity that the maker of your operating system has sadly activated for you are turned off...".
Yay, buy a MacBook Pro, some dollars you pay were spent to make all this idiocy!
Unfair take meet hyperbole take.