Both this article and Microsoft are referring to the same thing (low-rank adaptation, LoRA, which I have lazily miscapitalized). What is the confusion that you think will be addressed by my fixing that?
LoRA is LOw Rank Adaptation, the LLM tuning technique
Even if not in this specific comment thread, maybe having correct capitalization here means someone else knows how to write the one they mean to talk about in another conversation later, and then it will have been helpful.
If everyone went around calling both of them LORA all the time absolutely that's going to sometimes have people talking past each other about different technologies. Even with them capitalized correctly it's still going to, but not as much.
Too bad Microsoft didn't call theirs LoRaA and it would've been more obvious.
They (and I) may need to do a double-take if they process it wrong, and you reduce that risk by being as clear as possible, despite Microsoft's incredibly poor naming choice.
By analogy, if I refer to MICRO soft, and their operating system, I'm sure there's no confusion to you. But it is harder to read, and may (for longer sentences) require re-reading the whole sentence.
(and, of course, the other replies you got, and other people being confused every single time there's any announcement or article about LoRA)