Electricity production in Croatia is already much “greener” than the EU average: approximately 30% is generated from fossil fuels (10% coal, 20% gas). Remaining is mostly hydro, with significant amount produced from wind and 15-20 % is nuclear.
Source: https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/HR
Germany is only worse them in emissions because they temporarily boosted coal usage last winter to ease gas supply constraints. All of that added coal capacity is now back offline, and it's looking like they should be able to keep it offline this winter, but we'll have to see.
That and they closed nuclear power plants
Coal usage has continued to fall despite the closure of the nuclear power plants (though obviously it'd fall even faster if they had kept them open).
So nuclear's definitely more than zero that this map shows, but it's technically imported from Slovenia, though not really. It's one of those edge cases you can't fit neatly on a map.
There's also a graph for the origin of electricity that's available in the 24 hour view that shows different origin countries mixed in with different fuel sources.
Except it's absolutely not. As in the source they use (ENTSO-E) absolutely has no notion of energy sources. I can also see that the other source they've listed for Croatia is offline, and according to Wayback that been the case for at least a year. In conclusion, carbon intensity per 24h might as well be pulled out of their asses because they, and I can't stress this enough, don't have that data.
Meanwhile, the website of the nuclear power plant, which is again co-owned by Croatian state-owned electricity company, tells me it's responsible for 16% of Croatia's annual electricity usage, while this website tells me it's zero. Gee, I wonder which of the two is more of an authoritative source.
Seriously, stop trying to correct someone that's local to the area and knows a bit more about the situation than what you've learned in the past 20 min via your shitty global web project that has to take a shit ton of shortcuts in order not to be empty.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1291750/carbon-intensity....
It's alarming to see how much this diverges from the numbers from Statistica.
EDIT: I misunderstood the UI. If I click "6 years", it shows 301 for 2022. Also, it claims 0 consumption of nuclear, which must be wrong given the information about the nuclear plant above.
Can anyone see where Scotland sits? Our live snapshot current shows 7 gCO₂/kWh: