very much a noahs ark scenario, but we may best use a number of avenues, such as exoplanetary colonies.
very much a noahs ark scenario, but we may best use a number of avenues, such as exoplanetary colonies.
IIRC we've not even found one that has free oxygen in the atmosphere yet. Even if we did, anything with that and water would be extremely exiting by the standards of exoplanets, even if it had an average temperature of 75 C which would kill humans.
But I wouldn't underestimate the multitude of ways in which this planet could be made inhospitable by us.
We are trusting a lot on the self-correcting power of nature on this planet, but we just don't know if there isn't some tipping point after which there is no return.
That's yet to be proven - although not in my lifetime, I hope. One would hope that humankind would finally manage to do something before it gets as bad as on Venus, but I wouldn't bet on it...
Even if we burned 100% of all biomass on Earth, leaving it dead, it's still not close to Venus, where the "air" is so thick it's passed the critical point and no longer distinguishable from a liquid.
Even if we did that, the day length on Venus is longer than its year.
It becomes really tangible just how much we drank the kool aid of capitalism when people can more easily imagine moving ontonexoplanet colonies than a future where the gain of the few capitalists isn't literally priorized above the survival of the human race.
Why do you think the next planet won't fall victim to the same mechanisms?