[0]: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/investing/retail-sears-privat...
[1]: https://www.stern.nyu.edu/experience-stern/faculty-research/...
[0]: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/investing/retail-sears-privat...
[1]: https://www.stern.nyu.edu/experience-stern/faculty-research/...
May a lot of noise, declare you're done with Twitter's bots and BS, sell a ton of stock -- not because it's overhyped, no it's for Twitter -- and then back out of the sale.
And he would've gotten away except he tried to back out 3 times and they held him to it. So now he's got this trainwreck situation, and he's doing what he thinks is the right play, lemons into lemonade.
Also not sure about R&D, as I don't know what R&D Twitter was doing pre-acquisition, but there's been an extraordinary increase in the rate of addition of new features and changes to the platform.
I don’t think that’s ever likely to offset the massive amounts of debt Musk offloaded to Twitter’s balance sheet to fund the acquisition.
> changes to the platform.
Likely one of the most horrible rebrandings in the history of corporate rebranding?