Ash HN: Best Micropayment Processor? | Hacker News Reader

Ash HN: Best Micropayment Processor?

35 pointsginkoutest30 comments

I want to work on a project that allows for easily sharing paywalled links for the price of $1. It seems Stripe will take 30 cents (plus transaction fees) on every dollar processed, and PayPal will take 49 cents, for credit card payments. Are there any cheaper alternatives out there?

I considered a workaround to use the Venmo API because it seems they only charge 3% for credit card processing. But are there any significant cons I should be aware of before building a SaaS on top of Venmo to facilitate high volumes of $1 payments?

View on HN

The usual solution is to just do a stored value system; give people a wallet in your system that they can top off in $20 increments, then the actual microtransactions are just a database write.

But that is also a terrible system for a user. I try to avoid any app that does this.

curious do you find other systems? Because as OP says it s still not feasible to do microtransactions on the web

In theory I agree, meaning I'm the same way.

In practice I don't believe it's true though, as there are very popular (outside the US) payments systems like Satispay the are exactly like that.

To a first approximation your experience is why micropayments have never taken hold…

They seem as much like a great idea here in 2023 as they did in 1994 when I first read about the idea. I had just started using the internet.

Micropayments are infeasible because financial infrastructure has non-trivial costs. The costs are non-trivial because there the highest incentives to steal money and thus systems need hardened surfaces.

At $0.30/transaction the cost of 10,000,000 automated attacks per hour/day/week becomes real money.

And at $0.30/transaction there seems to be enough money to provide enough resources to make the system robust enough.

Anyway, charging more is an easy way to make the business viable if it is going to be viable…and if you can’t provide $10 of value it probably isn’t.

Good luck.

Indeed. Even stored value systems that cannot be directly cashed out suffer fraud. E.g. Toll-free phone numbers suffer traffic pumping fraud. Fraudsters robocall and try to keep each call going as long as possible as they get a cut of the per minute revenue. Bitcoin ushered in the direct monetization of stolen CPU time without having to first use it for spam, DDoS, etc.

whatever happened to flattr?

Both PayPal and Stripe have a separate ‘micro transactions’ pricing that they will enable upon your request. Instead of 2.9%+$0.30, they will charge you 5%+$0.05.

No experience with Stripe, but PayPal's micropayment pricing isn't available for as many countries as their normal credit card pricing, and it's not guaranteed that they'll enable it if you ask.

OH wow. Thank You I didn't know that. So basically 10% for $1 transaction. If my calculation is correct the breaking point is $12. So anything under $12, assuming the country supports it.

If you are making an app, have you simply considered Apple and Google's in-app purchases for these transactions? You can totally just charge $1. Apple and Google will then take exactly 30% (which is 30 cents). There are programs where you can reduce that to 15%.

This is going to be unpopular here, but Bitcoin’s layer 2 Lightning Network is pretty ideal for micropayments.

Strike (strike.me) is a Venmo-like app that lets users connect their bank account and then hold a USD balance. The only difference is that users can use their USD to send Bitcoin to the other end. They’re not exposed to bitcoin’s price volatility.

On nostr, users are sending micro tips to other each other fairly successfully. The UX isn’t great right now, but I recommend trying it out- it is a functioning version of social micro payments.

Crypto, Bitcoin and the rest of it cannot (and can never be) a solution to micropayments at all.

It encourages people to lose their money due to extreme volatility and nobody uses it for anything other than speculative trading which also encourages people to lose money.

stablecoins.

Stablecoins are not stable at all.

tokens like LUNA went to 0 and USDC, USDT and others depegged which isn't really convincing as a micropayments alternative, in fact it is extremely dangerous.

Stablecoins are more stable than BTC and ETH, so they have quite a bit more utility than one might think, given your comment.

Nope, what are they backed by? Nothing other than 'attestations' and 'trust me bro'.

Tether is a fraudulent ponzi, USDC is not stable and is backed by meaningless attestations, Luna is, well gone all the way to the floor.

Even if we take USDC on ETH there exists the uncontrollable volatile gas fee tax which is pointless for micropayments.

'Stablecoins' (or 'stabletokens' are inherently fraudulent and dead on arrival and is only used to pump the price of BTC in the which is the case for Tether.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-10-07/crypto-my...

What is USD “backed by”? It’s not gold and it’s not any USG promise to pay.

Stablecoins don’t need to be backed by anything to be stable. I agree with most of what you say, but that doesn’t actually refute my point that stablecoins are, in fact, more stable than most cryptocurrencies. They are more than stable enough to use for a payment aggregation layer for a few days.

I even agree with you about Tether being a fraud; I still use USDT every day (with that knowledge) because it is, well, stable. One day it won’t be, but most days, it is.

At least we know it was backed by _something_, fiat is the worst system except all the others.

Yet USD is legal tender for US taxes and there is a shared interest in using USD rather than some risky unknown potemkin token like 'stablecoins', which nobody accepts or wants.

And you cannot pay US taxes with your stablecoins, so there's that.

> Stablecoins don’t need to be backed by anything to be stable...

So then we will get a LUNA situation of being backed by 'algorithms' then everyone is screwed when the token inevitably goes to zero.