The $53.000 Intel Mac Pro won't be usable for developing VisionOS apps
developer.apple.com
developer.apple.com
Only if more than a tiny sliver of the resale market for that product is for VisionOS development (a market segment that does not yet really exist).
The motherboard should support up to 12TB ram.
And it's a plain regular HP ProLiant server, so it's not going to give you any hassle when running Linux. Heck, some distributions (likely RHEL or SuSe) might even be certified for use on that platform.
So to sum up: for people with money and wanting to play on large-ish datasets, a second hand mac pro is really a poor choice on how to spend their money.
Note: i didn't even look that hard for a better offer or a better-priced listing.
But yes - good luck selling a 1.5TB Mac to anyone not doing video production (and depending on the platform) for anything remotely close to retail prices.
Apple probably realized they only sold approximately three fully configured machines and decided 192GB should be enough for anyone.
I think it's a much worse state of affairs that a $6000 base Mac Pro from a few months ago, which was marketed to developers, cannot do this development. Arguably the Mac Studio was a better targeted machine for those developers, but even that only takes us back a year or so. A $6000 machine for development should last a while – even for professional use where more expense can be tolerated, it should still have 3+ years of support.
The whole point is to distill the problem to it's essense and make it impossible to ignore.
Obviously there are various reasonable sounding reasons how such a state of affairs comes to be. The point was that regardless, at the end of the day, there is an absurdity here, and it is not "I assumed my 50k Apple computer would be usable for Apple development." There is no hard tecnical limit to excuse it. It's completely fair to call it out.
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it right well might just be a duck.
Would be a good machine for data scientists as well, but those usually prefer cloud instances that reside near the data rather than bringing the data to the workstation.
There is no actual technical limit here, only a typically inconsiderate policy one.
Any architecture may produce any collection of bits for any other, and even run them and test them. Every m1 user sees this every day when they continue to run intel apps.
(yes I know this person in European and they your decimal point as thousand separator)
You need to write a medium.com rant and submit that :-)
And was only kept around at all was to give more time for legacy users to migrate.
You can buy a Mac mini which is a great development machine for < $1000.