Lenovo PC boss: 4 in 5 of our devices will be repairable by 2025
theregister.com
theregister.com
In one case, after they were found out they first claimed "we have thoroughly investigated this technology and do not find any evidence to substantiate security concerns" and only after it started being reported by more and more news orgs did they finally admit to what they'd done and release instructions on how to fix it.
Sadly, those instructions removed the bloatware, but left the vulnerability it introduced in place giving users a false sense of security, and only after they were caught out for that in the press did they finally release a "removal tool"
The wikipedia page doesn't even list all their offenses or the most recent events. See also : https://www.zdnet.com/article/lenovo-patches-uefi-vulnerabil...
Repairable or not, use Lenovo at your own risk.
that was consumer side Lenovo laptops, IdeaPad and the like 7+ years ago. They learned their lesson and even there don't do it any more.
This didn't affect ThinkPads.
Every time Lenovo is mentioned someone brings this up and I am thoroughly sick of it.
Yeah I think it's fair to say Lenovo is still no good here.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/lenovo-receives-3-5m-fine-for-...
When a company engages to such deceptive business and outright illegal business practices, there is little reason to trust them for a decade or two until we can be sure everyone who worked there by the time is gone.
That seems a little extreme. I always maintain a skeptical eye, but most corporate leaders have an eye for profits and PR, and their personal integrity/moral compass doesn't play a large role in their decision making. As long as it's bad/risky PR for Lenovo to do stuff like that, the incentives are on our side. Always be watching though, and I personally favor vendors who have good track records.
I wouldn't completely discard the idea to be honest.
Maybe after several decades have gone by without incident I might consider that they've changed their ways, but I sure wouldn't count on that happening.
Here's them still not having learned their lesson in Feb of 2021 https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/03/lenovo_indelible_adwa...
Here's them still not having learned their lesson in April of 2022 https://www.zdnet.com/article/lenovo-patches-uefi-vulnerabil...
Today, I wouldn't trust this company to make an alarm clock (https://blog.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability-spotlight-h...) let alone a laptop.
https://www.theregister.com/2018/01/26/lenovo_thinkpad_finge...
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2984889/lenovo-collect...
https://www.crn.com.au/news/thinkpad-vulnerable-in-latest-le...
https://www.pcworld.com/article/633410/up-to-100-lenovo-lapt...
https://www.itpro.com/security/vulnerability/369491/lenovo-p...
Now you guys are listing security vulnerabilities when the topic was spyware. Everything has vulnerabilities. They are fixed. So what?
If I did this, I'd be learning my lesson in prison for 20 years.
1. The malware was a rootkit for Windows
2. Windows has an interesting "feature" that will blindly auto-install software that is embedded in a certain location in the BIOS. If a rootkit is placed there, Windows will always try and install it.
It's bad for Lenovo, but it's also bad that Windows has this anti-feature.
https://michlstechblog.info/blog/windows-identify-a-wpbt-bin...
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/06/millions-of-pc-moth...
With my motherboard you can deny the install at least.
The writers of the malicious software lenovo has so far been caught including in their products were specifically targeting windows users, but I see no reason to think that they wouldn't include malicious software that targets linux if some seedy company decided it was worth the effort to write it and offered lenovo enough cash. Their total lack of integrity and respect for their customers is enough that I could never feel fully confident that I was safe just because I was running a non-windows OS.
and/or for malware that can disable WFP.
I want to emphasize how bad the TLS MITM malware was (adware is too nice a term): they installed a TLS MITM attack by adding the same CA public key to the trust store of every non-business device they sold, and then proxied all internet traffic through an on-device MITM proxy that contained the private key to that CA. Yes you read that right: every device with this malware had the public and private key used to decrypt the TLS traffic of every other device with this malware, effectively exposing every user to have all of their traffic both decrypted and MITM'd again by anyone who tries. This train wreck was malicious and incompetent.
I don't consider this a technical failure, this is a fatal business failure: either nobody in Lenovo reviewed this software integration from a privacy and security perspective, or they did review it and the business deal overruled the security team's ability to veto it, or they're so inept that they didn't notice how bad it was. In any case, this indicates an organizational dysfunction so severe there's no way I can trust Lenovo with my personal or business security again.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22194428 | Lenovo now shipping Ubuntu on high end workstations in the US
But in the past few years, I have taken to just buying Dell's midrange business laptops. The build quality can vary by model but they are cheaper, ubiquitous, have great support while in warranty, and Linux always runs just fine on them if you pay attention to the hardware you're buying.
Model: Precision 7520 Cpu: i7-6820HQ Memory: 32gb Gpu: Nvidia Quadro M2200 4GB Storage: 500gb SSD Display: 15" 1080p
Pretty good specs for the price. Serviceable for older/lower requirements games. Pretty bulky machine though.
Granted - My work has been heavy on memory but light on CPU, so perhaps I'm not applying enough deadly heat.
TBF their monitors are good. I have two Dell P2723QE's and they are absolutely great.
My magnesium top cased T480 (non-s) with 64 GiB RAM, (4) 72 Whr batteries and the internal one still works and is good enough for the girls I go out with and Windows 11 Enterprise.
Now a lot of things I miss a lot. The modularity, latches, ThinkLight, the upside down Thinkpad logo on the outside shell (oriented correctly towards the user, not the other people in the room), 7 row keyboard, good Fn keys functionality like media keys. The T400 that I regularly stood on to impress people how sturdy it was. But all of these things cost a lot in terms of weight and size (except the logo which was just copying the change that Apple made).
Just so you know the context: these are the machines I used a lot. T42p, R60, T400, T440s, T470s, T495s, T14s Gen2 (current).
If you respect the sturdiness vs. form factor trade-off, I believe build quality has gone up with every machine I bought.
I have an E585 (bought it with the 2700U and 1080p screen upgrades, but added my own SSD and extra RAM because Lenovo charged the moon) and it replaced an X230 Tablet.
Even though it's the "upgraded" screen, it's still dim and disappointing. I understand very few Thinkpads have excellent screens; while the X230T's was brighter, it managed to burn the browser chrome after a few years of using it for lap-surfing.
The X230 had a slide-off-the-back-side battery. The E585's is inside the case. You could slide open little hatches to access the storage and memory on the X230. The E585 was a single-piece cover with 8 or 9 captive screws and then has to be pried apart with snaps.
The E585 has a rubber foot to prop it to provide clearance for the vents; the tape holding it on gave out a couple months ago, so I've stuck little white adhesive rubber furniture feet on it.
Sometimes you can find a random business-line HP or Dell with one, but the Dell one I tried (some 7th generation Core i5 I rode for five years at work) was so terrible, especially on scrolling, that I just plugged in an external mouse, and it's a feature that appears on random models intermittently when it does appear, so it might not meet any of my other (admittedly limited) requirements.
Windows 11 installed clean with support drivers has only minimal Lenovo items:
- Lenovo EasyResume Service - enables a grace period before hibernation
- Lenovo HotKey Client Loader - makes the special keys work
- Lenovo Intelligent Thermal Solution Service - fans go brrrrr
- Lenovo Platform Service - (not running)
- Lenovo PM Server - power management coordinator
The only other thing is their user-attended updater, Lenovo Update Service, that doesn't run in the background and doesn't do anything uncommanded. It finds driver, BIOS, and firmware updates. It's optional and you have to install it yourself.
To me, "repairable" means "capable of being repaired in a practical way". I'll also grant you the unstated "at a reasonable price", which for me, having a cheapskate nature, I've always found the repair parts (batteries, screens, and buttons) to be extremely reasonable in price.
For people who don't want to DIY it, most every mall has a kiosk that will do it for 2-3x what I paid, but still <15% of the price of a new iPhone.
"If it can be repaired in a practical way, it's repairable" seems more resilient and probably no more a judgment call than the design questions above.
It's not truly repairable if no parts are available.
Apple and others put in a lot of effort to stop independent repair shops from sourcing original parts or making them impossible to successfully replace due to hardware DRM. It is already impossible to upgrade some Macs with more RAM because they will simply refuse to boot if they find more RAM than they got in the factory.
Such as? That's an outlandish claim unless you have receipts to back it up.
He does get things wrong occasionally, he's only human after all, but he tends to publish very public retractions which is more than can be said for professional journalists.
That's certainly a take, but not one that I can ever agree with.
https://www.ifixit.com/News/82867/iphone-15-teardown-reveals...
The iPhone 6 disabled Touch ID when the home button was replaced but it'd still function fine as a button - until you restored the phone, which would fall over with an arbitrary error code forcing you to take the phone in to Apple for repair. There was a lot of backlash before they caved and fixed the update process: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/feb/05/error-53-apple...
On a desktop pc you can repair anything pretty easily. Some things we wouldn't even call a repair. A new monitor is call just that. A new screen for a phone is much more involved.
And then there's granularity.
Can that broken usb port be replaced or does it require a new motherboard.
Your $20 Apple watch repair has 2 components. The parts cost and the labour cost.
If the repair takes 2 hours by a skilled technician that's going to cost more than a 5 minute job that anyone can do. And in first world countries, it's probably labour that will dominate.
Conclusion: soldering is not ok for repairability
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/05/microsofts-panos-panay-expla...
(I actually bought 3 of them, one for my son and one for my S.O. Those didn't need to last for hours at a time so they're on original battery+memory and work great)
I know it's in the industries interest to force E-Waste, but it's not in the public interest.
But also can't seem to figure out how to buy it lol
It would be really nice to have such a phone though!
The PC equivalent.
Actually, question: at which point in time is it less eco-friendly to keep using an old computer considering power consumption and the fact that for the same amount of work it will need to use more power for a much longer time? 10 years? 20 years?
But since then, there are fewer major improvements coming that fast. GPUs improve, but most people aren't hardcore gamers for whome that matters, and these can mostly be upgraded independent of the computer itself instead.
Other than that, if you're mostly just using your web browser, and maybe doing some spreadsheets and desktop-based email, what's the point? Even if you're doing more demanding stuff like Photoshop, we're at a point where the app's demands aren't growing fast either.
It's perfectly fine. I do wish I had more CPU cores, but it's probably better for me to get up and step away from the computer while it runs a big C++ compilation or something
Why would they buy any quicker? The average laptop in 2016 was only maybe 10% faster than a laptop in 2010 thanks to that stupid Ultrabook shit (and Intel refusing to push out more than a 10% YOY improvement in their standard-voltage desktop lineup), which resulted in 2020's CPU lineup only being about twice as fast as one made in 2010. And, so long as you had a machine with an SSD, there's very little difference between a laptop from 2015 and 2023 if all you're doing is browsing Facebook (which is what most people are doing with them).
Plus, at the end of the 2010s, tablets started to become mature enough to supplant laptops as the household's only computer, so you'd either buy a tablet or get a new laptop, but not both.
Phones are a different beast in two ways- first, if you're buying Android, you're throwing your phone away every 2 years anyway because the ecosystem sucks; Qualcomm is even more incompetent when it comes to hardware performance than Google is with software performance and it really shows, especially since Android allows manufacturers to stack a bunch of other unremovable shit and skins that does nothing but take up storage space, enshittifying the device right out of the box like having 10 unremovable IE6 toolbars did back when people still used IE6 (Lenovo is less guilty of this than some but it's still not as clean as a Pixel is). Plus, financial incentives exist (for both Android and iOS) to trade in one's old phone for a new one at a steep discount, they get smashed up far more frequently than laptops do in ways that make them impossible to fix, and they're fashion accessories to a point and it's nice to have the new one in a way that normal computers don't suffer from as much.
It's not rocket science; the industry became boring and stagnant so people moved on (and good GPUs have been unaffordable for the vast majority of the last decade including in prebuilts, so...)
Luckily there's another one I can charge from but it really feels like a ticking time bomb.
But dense SMD connectors with heat sensitive parts and damaged boards more than just suck.
This is one reason amongst many that I'm not a particularly big fan of USB-C
I definitely won't be buying the new models anymore. I can live with the fact that socketed CPUs have been replaced with soldered ones due to aesthetics (thinner laptops), but soldered RAM is where my pain threshold is reached.
I still believe that quality products must be repairable. I consider everything else to be cheap, throwaway products. No matter how much money "premium brands" charge for their junk with glued battery, glued SSD and fixed RAM in recycled aluminium packaging.
Is there a single technology company that you can't say this about?
My employer recently bought me a Lenovo Legion 5 Pro. Due to concussions and general flicker sensitivity, I don't do well with 60Hz screens, and I prefer AMD CPUs. This one came with a 240Hz screen. Overkill!
But... Bluetooth was unreliable. Every few hours, it vanished from Windows as if it didn't exist. A moment of sleep and wake was enough to bring it back, but it was still annoying to lose mouse and headphones unexpectedly.
Two support calls, but all they did was reinstall a bunch of the driver updates I had already reinstalled (and they installed Geforce Experience because Vantage said it was available.) Unsurprisingly, none of that fixed the issue. The next step was a factory reset and/or replacement, which would've been a big PITA because of time I already spent doing setup. And it still might not have solved the issue.
Instead, I spent $23 on an Intel AX210 WLAN/Bluetooth chip, and performed the replacement (of a Realtek chip) in well under 10 minutes. Taking off the bottom panel was relatively easy, and I did not see any damaged clips. M.2 and SODIMM chips are readily replaceable, and so was this WLAN chip. It also fixed my problem completely without resorting to losing a lot of time repeating my setup.
If there's a point, it's that budget and mid-range gaming laptops are often quite repairable, where as thin and light / ultrabooks, especially those made for businesses are much less frequently repairable. I think the reason is two-fold... in general businesses will just pay for repairs, even when it means sending a device back. And of course smaller machines tend to get soldered components and optimize for size instead of access.
You have to think about the compromises you're willing to make, or to have built into your purchases.
It's funny, because the most serviceable laptops I've ever taken apart were the old enterprise ones my dad's company used to issue him, where half the parts were serviceable without even opening the chassis.
Of course, that changed recently when some fruit company popularized the "ultrabook" category and now every company is trying to sandwich every component in the 1cm span between two screwless sheets of aluminum.
I wish they made charging plugs easier to replace, as these inevitably get damaged after 1-2 years, but that's really the only complaint I can think of. Is the situation different for other device types, or are they just trying to score an easy (if deserved) PR win?
I don't give a fuck how thin or light my laptop is. I want it big and beefy with some monstrous heatsinks and fans that don't sound like a jet engine after 3 seconds of CPU load. I want all the ports and a battery that weighs five pounds.
Current design trends for laptops has resulted in significantly worse machines. It's why I still use a T530 from 2013 as my daily driver. I'll probably keep using it until it finally develops a fault that I can't repair. Barring a catastrophic accident like a spill or a drop, I expect it to keep on chugging for at least another 5-10 years.
Same. I've been buying them off-lease for many years. You can usually get them for a couple hundred bucks. Best non-Apple computers I've ever used. Keyboards are awesome.
The last laptop I bought was a Dell XPS13 because research indicated it's a pretty popular Linux-compatible laptop. It's nice, but I'm going back to a Thinkpad next...
Removable GPU = both battery savings AND prevention of gaming temptation when I need to work. >..<
It left me with the impression that Lenovo had questionable quality / end-user repairability, but excellent support (as long as it's still under warranty!)
I have 5 old Thinkpads, all still operational. Some are now 10+ years old, and have been passed on to children. They've been through hell and still work. They are the toughest laptops I've owned, and they have repair manuals to boot. Nearly everything is replaceable.
I can get why this is done for thin and light laptops. But not everyone needs that. I am completely willing to have 200g added to the weight of a laptop to get replaceable RAM.
I like Apple for batteries that last longer than 12 months, screens with high resolution and reference color, lightweight housing that's not too flimsy. (just don't talk about the keyboards from 2016-2018 ;) )
I can get a brand new company macbook shipped to my house in less than 24 hrs if anything goes wrong w/ my machine, and things rarely go wrong. You can't realistically beat that
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023...
Most non technical users see their computers the same way as a DVD player.
I think the overall trend is still toward Steve Job's vision. Looking at Tesla for example, does not fill me with optimism of a modular/repairable future.
So I tried to do it myself. Studying official materials, repair videos, the like. The important thing I learned is to get exactly the correct Wi-fi card because the laptop (the BIOS I guess) rejects any other type not on the "allow list".
So I ordered it and connected it, which was easy enough. Still rejects it.
Also, the laptop shipped with a wrong keyboard layout. Which my family member reported directly after purchase but Lenovo refused a return.
At work I also have a company issues Lenovo. It keeps prompting for firmware updates. The last time I applied it, it crashed the entire machine and it took me days to get it in working order again.
Your mileage may vary but to me these are Russian roulette machines. Fragile, full of arbitrary limitations, shit software, worse support.
With Lenovo vendor locking CPUs on desktops?
https://www.servethehome.com/lenovo-vendor-locking-ryzen-bas...
Lenovo is fairly competitive in the 700-1500€ market but the thin and light models have soldered ram. Not great when they sell you single channel with zero ability to add more sticks on some models. It's not as terrible now due to ddr5 but still leaves bad taste.