Do you agree with the look and feel lawsuit that Apple had against MS? Or think that Roku, Amazon, Google , etc did something untoward because they came after Apple with set top boxes?
Do you agree with the look and feel lawsuit that Apple had against MS? Or think that Roku, Amazon, Google , etc did something untoward because they came after Apple with set top boxes?
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/amazon-copied-produ...
> thousands of pages of internal Amazon documents examined by Reuters – including emails, strategy papers and business plans – show the company ran a systematic campaign of creating knockoffs and manipulating search results to boost its own product lines in India, one of the company's largest growth markets.
A big company can stall a copyright lawsuit for as long as it wants. Small companies cannot win against a large compamy like Amazon in court.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-07-14-fi-19337-...
Especially when they can just twist the court system however they wish.
Small victories like the chain wrench lawsuit against Sears happen. But they are rare.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bionic-wrench-sea...
Your response shows that you did no read the article. They specifically show cases where Amazon copied sizes:
> Among the victims of the strategy: a popular shirt brand in India, John Miller, which is owned by a company whose chief executive is Kishore Biyani, known as the country's "retail king." Amazon decided to "follow the measurements of" John Miller shirts down to the neck circumference and sleeve length, the document states.
And CVS follows the formula of name brand OTC drugs down to the very ingrediant to make house brands. You can’t copyright a shirt measurement.
And before you call me an “Amazon shill”. I got PIPed from Amazon less than two months ago. I’m the last person who has any love for Amazon. Honestly I don’t have any feeling either way. It was just my 8th job over 25 years, they gave me a nice check and I had a comparable offer within two weeks.
Like with the sears example, large 'mall' like organizations do outright steal designs and stonewall the original copyright holder.
A random housebrand does not have access to Amazon's statistics, logistics or reach. Amazon is looking at stats that they hide from their providers, to choose who to copy, then out-price the original seller. (Due to inhouse logistics)
They are not even remotely the same thing.
And Walmart sells a lot more than Amazon.
You don’t think that every store knows how to undercut other products in its own store with house brands?
As far as Amazon copying others as a marketplace owner, ever heard of the Kirkland’s brand? Store brands have been around forever.