Hacker News Reader

Comment by ejstronge | Hacker News Reader

I don't think 'MLS' is a single entity - instead different areas have their own MLS, and these are interconnected based on contracts. Thus, there isn't a monopoly to disrupt in the first place.

View on HN

"Most MLSs are owned by the REALTOR® association that formed them." See: https://www.reso.org/blog/mls-faq/

Read the Redfin post. The rules the REALTOR association imposes to get access to MLS data is monopolistic.

I did read the post.

There is no monopoly because there is no single 'MLS'

It's perfectly possible for there to be many of them and for them to also be monopolies over their respective regional markets. Compare with cable companies carving up territory and agreeing not to intrude on eachother's turf.

There’s another word for that: cartel

Cartel is the correct word. As an individual consumer, I wanted access to MLS data and was willing to pay a monthly access fee. But they wouldn't provide such access and want you to use the cartel member, real estate agent.

Correct, and some of the MLSs won't even sell you data (for all those trying to disrupt real-estate). They have exclusive agreements to only appear on Zillow or Realtor.com or something like that when I looked into it before.

Actually Zillow I think just scrapes sites, I don’t think they even have legal/API access. I hope someone puts a bullet in the Realtor industry.

They pay a fee for MLS access.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com