Don't romanticize death and dying, it's not good for people on the edge of caring about living.
(Edits to make my argument a bit less snarky.)
Where did you learn all of these things anyways, and which meaning of the word real are you working with?
String theory on the other hand operates at energy levels so small that it's completely inaccessible to us. A collider would have to be the size of the galaxy to probe the energy levels we're discussing. At the energy levels that govern on our lives and environment, quantum field theory doesn't require string theory to explain what's going on, and we would require godlike powers to approach testing it. This makes it very unreal. Not entirely unreal, and still important for understanding the corner cases, but it is about as ephemeral as it can get.
Something must not just be in principle falsifiable, but the means of falsifying it must be something we could possibly carry out. The more readily available those means, the more real a thing becomes.
I doubt it. I'm pretty sure whatever reality photons, black holes, etc are in, it's not really mine, except where it happens to slightly intersect with mine so I can detect it.
Also, if you’re on desktop with a suitably configured Compose key, it’s actually simple to type (Compose I R for example), no need for copy&paste.
How do you know that?