Indeed, it's much better to look at
all papers published on a topic and break them down into groups of papers that refute, those that support, and those that merely inform about a particular subject.
Eg: https://sciencebrief.org/topics/climate-change-science/wildf...
NASA put men on the moon in record time and additionally designed and launched fleets of earth monitoring satellites (multiple designs in multiple orbits), their data analysts support the notion that climate change has coincided with wildfires becoming more frequent, more likely to have several at the same time (straining resources), individually bigger, more severe, faster than ever before, and more destructive.
https://climate.nasa.gov/explore/ask-nasa-climate/3066/the-c...
Of course the comeback to that is "but global total area burnt has decreased each year" .. which is, of course, a weasal point - a reduction in the 2D area of fires because of fewer light grassland fires doesn't alter the fact that the 3D volume of fuel burnt has increased - notably in dense forest areas that "normally" very rarely burn.