What makes the author think something is changing?
What makes the author think something is changing?
It is a noun, not a pronoun. “Dude” is also gender neutral, to save you a post at a later date.
Basically, guys is neutral in those cases where it's used to describe a group that isn't entirely male but otherwise it's male (somewhat circular reasoning, but I can't think of a better way to describe it); guy doesn't usually get that same logic applied.
“THIS GUY, am I right?” - used to mock/express disbelief
“Bro” is also gender neutral, just adding in to this mix.
“Bro don’t play me like that.” “What’s up bro?”
“Dude, you wouldn’t believe what happened to me this weekend” gender ambiguous.
Context is everything.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/guy
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/guy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/guy
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/11816/is-guy-gen...
Note that wiktionary points out the fact that the female complement to "guy" is "gal". https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/guy
“Gal” seems derisive. I would assume someone was being berated or otherwise dismissed if being called “gal”. As in, “oh I suppose there are women here that I will address differently”, hence “gal”.
Wonder if there is a regional aspect to it, or perhaps it being an older and less used word has lead to more individual variance in connotations?