Could we speak without this kind of rhetoric? My command of French is not perfect and I'm telling you my understanding and asking you questions politely. If I misunderstand something then I apologise but you can point it out without being rude.
Having looked at it further I can see that they indeed meant that there was a great deal of underage content available on these sites at the time.
> Claiming racial categories to be racist is nonsense.
The racist element is in the use of race to depict power dynamics in a violent way.
> I am glad we that we could come to an agreement that the study is referencing something that doesnt exist anymore. Might explain why the article is flagged.
It doesn't explain it to me. We often discuss articles from the past on here. I still find it worthy of discussion that this was the case very recently, and I would also note that the move to remove this content only came as the result of legal pressures against the distributors.
> I really hope you can see how ludicrous it is to make these kind of claims.
Are you saying that what the study claims was not true at the time of their research?