“The U.S. government is involved in espionage against other governments,” he says flatly. “There’s a big difference, however, between the kind of cyberespionage the United States government does and China. The U.S. government doesn’t hack its way into Airbus and give Airbus the secrets to Boeing [many believe that Chinese hackers gave Boeing secrets to Airbus]. We don’t hack our way into a Chinese computer company like Huawei and provide the secrets of Huawei technology to their American competitor Cisco. [He believes Microsoft, too, was a victim of a Chinese cyber con game.] We don’t do that.”
“What do we do then?”
“We hack our way into foreign governments and collect the information off their networks. The same kind of information a CIA agent in the old days would try to buy from a spy.”
“So you’re talking about diplomatic stuff?”
“Diplomatic, military stuff but not commercial competitor stuff.”
-- http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Richard-Cl...
(Note: He's talking about the US government, not about any other US-based entities.)
I remember in the early 90s it was revealed that the French Intelligence had bugged Business-Class seats in Air France, and were passing commercial secrets to French companies: http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl/1992_1089133/i...
[I should add something about the degree of separation of govt and corps being a factor.]
If you want a declassified historical account, look back at the US IC programs to furnish sabotaged/backdoored electronics during the later years of the Cold War.
I am assuming IC == integrated circuit? Was that program targeting the USSR govt or private industry, such as may have existed? Was the backdoor designed to steal state secrets or economic secrets?
But your link is a little undersourced? And I'm really having a hard time with the part about Motorola. "The 1995 Motorola letter is proof positive that Bill Clinton is directly responsible for the present-day U.S. intelligence disaster." Giving Motorola an encryption export waiver (which is something crypto geeks had been fighting for for years) is proof that Clinton turned the NSA into a cash cow?
Really, I am interested in the topic, but your link is more of a hit piece than anything.
[The link noibl posted is exactly the interview I was thinking of wrt Boeing and Airbus.]
NewsMax. I'd sooner watch Fox News or read the gaggle of NYT's neocon pundits.