Creationism, but with a science-y spin this time.
A. “Per our understanding of the universe, which is now finally provably correct and complete, no intelligent life whatsoever could have been causally involved in the emergence of various stellar objects or humanity itself.”
B. “Since our understanding of the universe is most likely incorrect and/or incomplete, some kind of intelligent life we are not yet aware of may or may not have been causally involved in the emergence of various stellar objects or even humanity itself.”
C. “We were made by fantasy abstract creature(s) not subject to any physical laws of this universe. We should probably worship them.”