I would struggle to talk to them for 3 minutes.
My friends are my friends because they have the right values, priorities, and culture. My culture has almost no overlap with that of the "community" in which I live. They don't know my music, my food, my memes, my values, my lifestyle. We're not even awake at the same time. All we share is geographic proximity.
Pretty much every time I talk to random people in the US for more than a few minutes, they drop inflammatory remarks to see how I respond, to identify which side of the culture war I am on, so they can (based on my identifying responses) either antagonize or befriend me. I ignore these comments, as I am disinterested in the American culture war and its political sports-teamism.
The article is right, and I think yours is a casual dismissal.
I think that's an understated problem right there - suburbs are awful for fostering good relationships. Some suburbs have gone out of their way to have events like block parties - but most have no real common every-day interaction and the infrequency of common tasks like shifting grocery shopping to a once a week task and minimizing interactions outside of PTA meetings is really hurting our ability to form strong social bonds.
I live in a city so my neighbors are a metric ton of randomly selected folks who I pass often walking on the street and doing life tasks - additionally the population density is high enough that I have multiple different board game events hosted by stores and a plethora of choices for D&D groups to choose from. I think that density makes a very big difference.
I am pretty against neighbor relations these days. I spend a lot of energy and money maintaining relationships with my friends from the scenes in which I inhabit, who are in many different cities.
99% of people out there aren't looking to get into a fight with you no matter how different you are. They aren't looking to change your views on things or have their own views changed. The sooner you accept that, the easier building new relations with them will be.
We're an immigrant family in the Netherlands and we could do with more colourful hair around here.
My opinion is every suburban neighborhood should be planed with a central community garden place.
If you want to be a misanthrope that's fine, but that's on you, not your local community.
In the US I find conformity to be widely regarded as desirable, and being "weird" to be seen as a negative. I am weird. This lowers most normal people's opinions of me.
Weird. Everyone in my neighborhood avoids politics like the plague.
I think my favorite part about where I live is my neighbors. The thing we have most in common with is our community, kids, and the troubles that come with home ownership.
We invite eachother over for pool parties and BBQs. My neighbor, who I'm pretty sure is exactly the opposite of me politics-wise (I've heard him talking in the backyard before), nevertheless invites everyone over for labor day and 4th of July. We talk house and neighborhood problems. His kids are only slightly younger than me but we still talk kid stuff.
Another neighbor is on a fire safety council (a non-profit) and helps deal with some of the issues with that, and I've helped them with tech stuff before. You wouldn't think it, but he's kinda a nerd himself. This is a 60 year old retired firefighter with a garage full of motorcycles who could probably bench press me but his house is full of legos and star wars stuff.
In general, people are very happy to help with problems and cordial. We have a text message thread with about 15 houses on it.
100 years ago - the blink of an eye on the timeline of humanity - it would have been ludicrous. Now it's become commonplace for the friends you make in your youth to experience a global diaspora out of convenience and personal preference, and to try to maintain a relationship using technology and occasional travel. It also seems reasonable for people to make friends with reasonable success to the small fraction of people geographically scattered over the globe who happen to share your taste in music and all your other hyperspecific personal preferences, connecting again through technology and travel.
The big question is whether this is reasonable. I thought in 2006 that I'd maintain friendships with the friends I made (due to physical proximity!) in my high school classes and athletic teams using Facebook. Instead, Facebook decided to use my attention on their platform due to those friends to sell ads, and the relationship maintenance got harder, and eventually went by the wayside. The handful I still maintain contact with happen to have physical proximity more than commonality of values/priorities/culture.
The friends I have on forums, Discord, Reddit, and in Rocket League/Minecraft due to shared interests are real people, probably perfectly nice, just physically located on the other side of the Internet connection and a screen (or microphone), but if I've never shared a handshake, hug, meal, or home with them are they the same kind of friends as my neighbors, members of local rec leagues and hackerspaces, workplace friends, and other people who live near me?
The big experiment of social media is whether nonconformity to local community, and instead forming virtual communities online, performs the same function to bring a happy, healthy life to the humans who practice it. You may say that it's too early to tell, that present failings are just growing pains, but I think the early evidence is quite strongly pointing towards "no".
Have you tried talking to them for 3 min? Your statement is written as if it’s a hypothetical.
When I talk to the parents at my kids school (5min from my house) I’m amazed at how much we have in common. 50% of the dads are computer programmers. I’ve found things in common with most of the other parents.
When I talk to my neighbours the one on my right has a PhD from the same college as me and the one on the left went backpacking to the same places as me.
You live where you do because of “reasons” your neighbours live there for similar reasons. We’re all random suburbanites.
I think it would be less of an issue in a more homogenous place, but southern Nevada is pretty firmly "purple" and people seem to try to classify you as friend or foe immediately upon meeting.
"to identify which side of the culture war I am on"
I _HATE_ this aspect of casual conversation with strangers in the US (or people in the Irish midlands trying to suss out if I'm Catholic or Protestant) and I do not miss it at all. Will the US have their own version of the Irish Troubles?
I'd suggest thinking of that as a skill to be developed.
I'm not sure you're doing something in your own life that's much different here from what those people in the States are doing to you. You too are dropping hints and observing responses to decide whether to befriend or antagonize a given person. Hence the tone of some of the other comments - you've successfully antagonized a few people by what you've written here. I can't really tell whether you just dislike this "cultural war" you have going on (whatever that is) or whether you also have a distaste for this whole befriend/antagonize mechanism in general.
In any case I'm glad you've got a group of people you can pal around with online. It's good to have friends.
Very real, and very hilarious. I called a tow truck recently in rural CO, and the driver asked where I lived. Upon hearing NYC, the first words out of his mouth were "I hear that's a real shithole. My phone's been telling me murders and robberies are way up." God bless America.
Beyond just neighbors - regardless of what activity/hobby you like, chances are there is some group/community near you. Getting involved and showing up on a regular basis will do wonders for cultivating new friendships IME, and you're likely to have a lot more in common with those folks than a random subset of people that you happen to live next to.
I moved from NYC to Boulder and then more recently to Westchester (just north of NYC). There are some really nice people in the town I live in, and we connect through having kids in the same schools. However, it's not nearly the same as my conference friends from the devrel world. We used to geek out over everything from carpentry to compilers, we had a shared community and interests, and because I got to present a lot and hang out with the other speakers, my "tribe" were geeky enough to be interesting, social enough to be an easy hang, and opinionated enough (they thought they were worth listening to on stage or they wouldn't have been presenters) that they usually had a hot take that was entertaining, enlightening or both.
I'm still looking for the small town where they all live so I can move nearer to them, but best as I can tell they are a nomadic people to be found only in airport lounges, hotel rooms, and occasionally on the side of the stage after their talk concluded :(
But in our modern, increasingly individualistic way of life going through the discomfort of "getting to know" your neighbors carries with it more cons than pros. You likely don't share any common interests or goals & are way too busy from $DAYJOB to build common ground. That same $DAYJOB may eventually pull you to a different city or state causing the weak connection you struggled to make to fade away.
Building relationships with others takes time and effort but the norms we've settled on in society make it very challenging to do so.
It used to be an entire village raising the entire village's kids. That was easy when everyone shared a language, culture, and food. You could trust the cooking of your neighbor 5 houses away, their standards were the same as yours. Then around the industrial revolution and later, that trust disappeared and it started to be one parent working 8 hours a day and one parent raising the kid (for the middle class), and households largely not helping each other.
Today it's both parents working for 8 hours a day, instead of a truly fair society in which each parent working 4 hours and take care of kids for 4 hours. They sold it to us as gender equality ("women and men should both work and both take care of the house" -- sounds great) but instead of redistributing the workload of 8 hours to 4 hours each, they (the landlords, the corporates, the shareholders) took advantage of the situation to overwork both men and women to 8+ or even 10+ or 12+ hours per day when we should all be working 4 if we want a fair, gender-equal society. Add on the problem of unequal pay being given to men and women, the result is usually the women having to give up their career in the name of household income because neither man nor woman's company is interested in letting them work for 4 hours each and the man's company is giving him 3X the woman's salary for the same amount of work.
And there's no village to help each other out when parents get sick or want/need to travel without the kids.
This is probably the biggest reason I'm most likely not wanting kids. There's just not time nor community resources for it. It doesn't sound like fun.