> From these tests, the researchers calculated that if each stage were scaled up to a square meter, it would produce up to 5 liters of drinking water per hour
So 1) They haven't yet tried this at the scale of one square meter. So this is a lab project that is nowhere close to commercialization but that doesn't stop them from making grand vague pronouncements about its potential. Classic MIT tbqh.
2) 5 liters per square meter per hour is trash. An average American uses a bit more than 300 liters of water a day, so you need 60 square meters of this to support one average American. So you'd need more than 5000 square kilometers of this to provide water to NYC. Does this sound like it's going to be cheaper than the tap water they already have?