Year after BLM protests, S&P 100 added 323K jobs – 94% went to people of color
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
I'm sure I missed plenty. I'm also sure there are plenty to come, but what they will be, I do not know.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_Me_a_Hero
[2] https://nypost.com/2016/05/08/obamas-last-act-is-to-force-su...
[3] https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-universitys-new-loyalty-oat...
[4] https://www.ams.org/journals/notices/201911/rnoti-p1778.pdf
[5] https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/mathematicians-divid...
[6] 80% of job postings for Arizona’s public universities required applicants to submit a statement detailing their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. - https://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/policy-report/the-new-loy...
[7] https://www.thecollegefix.com/san-diego-public-school-teache...
[8] New Hampshire, 94 Percent White, Asks: How Do You Diversify a Whole State? - https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/27/us/new-hampshire-white-di...
[9] A Black Virginia Girl Says White Classmates Cut Her Dreadlocks at a Playground - https://web.archive.org/web/20190927202007/https://www.nytim...
[10] Update: Virginia Girl Recants Story of Assault, and Family Apologizes - https://web.archive.org/web/20191001003852/https://www.nytim...
[11] https://freebeacon.com/media/yes-the-media-bury-the-race-of-...
> “four councillors – a majority – refused to vote to uphold the law, consistently opposing any limited desegregation.”
It should be noted that this ruling creating a precedent that all pubic housing had to follow, and was not the only such ruling [1] or executive order to that effect, as my 2nd link [2] from that post shows. A few more publications reporting on it, if you don't trust the NYPost: [3,4,5,6]
[1] The lawsuit was finally resolved with a verdict mandating that the Chicago Housing Authority redistribute public housing into non-black neighborhoods. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidized_housing_in_the_Unit...
[2] https://nypost.com/2016/05/08/obamas-last-act-is-to-force-su...
[3] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/obama-administration-an...
[4] https://www.today.com/tmrw/what-obama-biden-affh-rule-why-di...
[5] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-13/biden-to-...
[6] https://www.investors.com/politics/policy-analysis/obama-hud...
Brainwashed ChatGPT has difficulties discussing black racism. Even if it exists it's not nearly as bad as white.
Just ask 'anti-racists' about it and you'll see who they really are.
1. The year before this, 2020, saw disproportionately large job losses for non-white employees. It makes sense that the rebound would affect them disproportionately too.
2. People of the right age to retire or die/get disabled by Covid in large numbers are disproportionately white, while the people of the age to enter the workforce are disproportionately not, so it makes sense that job growth is mostly non-white.
Additionally, it looks like about a 50% of growth came from "less-senior jobs" This sector lost 19k white americans, while gaining 176k poc. With 60% of that sector's growth coming from hispanics. This sector houses "Sales, laborers, service workers and others." The higher sections that house "roles that typically require degrees" show different hiring patterns. With white americans making gains (that I believe are still disproportionatly low to their share of degree holders? Idk, someone else can do the math), and Asians making the most gains among managers and professionals.
I wish Bloomberg had mentioned how many people are actually employed at S&P 100 companies, I bet <150k professional+ highers is a drop in the bucket compared to their workforce.
Bloomberg also makes note that this trend may not have held past 2021 due to DEI being disincentived politically.
The article displays and explains its data well, though I wish they would have brought up the fact that Hispanics can totally be white. And given the title and the standfirst I expect this to start a lot of angry discussions online. Personally, I'd guess that a lot of the growth simply came from white hispanics and America's rapidly growing, highly educated asian population.
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer - (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
If read like a “normal” person would, it would suggest that this hiring preference based upon race was illegal. However if you read it like a Supreme Court judge who was legislating from the bench in the 1970’s, it says the law was intended to advance African Americans and can be used to advance them. That creative interpretation has yet to be overturned.
The breakdown by job category tells a different story from the headline. Whites were well represented in the growth of executives and professionals, but overall declined in the "less senior" category of laborers and service workers.
From the article's numbers, whites (57% of US) got 42% of executive jobs (N=~2677), 22% of manager jobs (N=~40K), and 28% of professional jobs (N=~104K). Summing these three categories, they got 39K of the 147K executive/manager/professional jobs, or 27%.
Your "well represented" is an under-representation of 0.47x - in the hiring categories where they are best represented.
... White people still hold a disproportionate share of the top, highly paid jobs in the US at S&P 100 companies. But the share of executive, managerial and professional roles held by people of color increased by about 2 percentage points compared with 2020
... In 2021, companies were hiring lots of people while prioritizing diversity. Many have since cut jobs amid an economic slowdown just as a backlash to corporate diversity efforts grows."
This is a common analytical fallacy.
Far more than 323K jobs were added...they're talking about NET jobs added.
> The overall job growth included 20,524 White workers. The other 302,570 jobs — or 94% of the headcount increase — went to people of color.
"Overall job growth" and "headcount increase" imply "net jobs added."